MW3 or Warfighter

w00dy85 · 3 Apr 2013 at 17:04

I have been looking at MW3 and Warfighter and I'm not sure which to get first. I have found them both quite cheap. Anyone recommend which is the better, I also only intend to play single player.

Tune · 3 Apr 2013 at 17:09

for single player I'd say warfighter, cod single player has never been anything special.

Omaeka · 3 Apr 2013 at 17:22

Doubt you'd get them cheaper than Battlefield 3 tbh, and that has the best modernFPS campaign out.

Mark1989 · 3 Apr 2013 at 17:47

Out of the two mw3 is better by quite allot warfighter was very poor compared to medal of honour which was a shame. Though bf3 is better than both

dreigns · 3 Apr 2013 at 18:19

I wouldn't get warfighter unless they paid you to play it

Mark3h · 3 Apr 2013 at 18:24

Id avoid both. If you are looking for an fps single player go for far cry 3.
Mw3 and warfighter are prime examples of what gaming has come to when the sole purpose of the game isnt enjoyment. But to milk the thumb twiddling dribbling mouthbreather masses.

Kosmiche · 3 Apr 2013 at 20:32

warfighter is bland dross, mw3 is bland dross.

w00dy85 · 3 Apr 2013 at 22:59

Omaeka said:
Doubt you'd get them cheaper than Battlefield 3 tbh, and that has the best modernFPS campaign out.

Thanks for recommending BF3, but I already have that and have finished the single player

I can get Warfighter limited edition for £9.99 and MW3 for £12.99. I have looked at Farcry 3 but I will get it later.

HankScorpio · 4 Apr 2013 at 01:07

I hear warfight is one of the worst games to come out in recent years. Avoid it like the plague. BF3 campaign is awful as well.

CoD4 was good I remember and Mw2.

LukieBoy007 · 4 Apr 2013 at 01:59

Neither, Metro 2033 on Steam right now for £3 - better than both

w00dy85 · 4 Apr 2013 at 08:11

Already got Metro 2033

Warfight dose seem to be a marmite game