NASA launches rocket at asteroid to prevent a planet threatening event

0.1% is one tenth, the article says it is less than this.

Ahh I'm shattered I didnt explain myself well sorry.

I meant I would just have expected it to say "less than 0.1%" rather than "less than 1/10 of 1%".

It just seems a really weird way to format it.
 
Ahh I'm shattered I didnt explain myself well sorry.

I meant I would just have expected it to say "less than 0.1%" rather than "less than 1/10 of 1%".

It just seems a really weird way to format it.

It's science, they like precision. :p
 
Sounds more like an Americanism to me. You don't use fractions in science, it's not an SI unit. :p

Of course they use fractions in science, what do you think maths or particle physics equations use. They were percentages though and they do use them, which they done.
 
Last edited:
Sounds more like an Americanism to me. You don't use fractions in science, it's not an SI unit. :p

Oh no, not again!
Reminds me of a slight problem that arose about 15 years ago when the usa probe crash-landed on Mars because one group of engineers were using imperial (pounds second) and a group of scientists were using SI units (Newton second)
 
epic title

"As well as keeping humanity alive, the robotic hunter could also tell us where live came from"

Also -

"And while the rock itself wouldn’t destroy Earth, though could cause huge destruction, there are asteroids flying around"

In fact the whole artical is terribly written.

How on earth has this guy got this job?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom