Nec ultra wide screen

[kablooey]

Pics from CES...






Specifications:
Display
Viewable Image Size 42.8” diagonal
Native Resolution 2880 x 900 (Double WXGA)+
Curved Seamless Image Yes
Response Time (typical) <0.02ms
Dynamic Range 12-bit (4096 levels)
Color Gamut (typical)
sRGB 100% coverage/160% size
Adobe RGB 99.3% coverage/119% size
Number of Colors 68.7 billion
Contrast Ratio (typical) >10,000:1
Brightness (typical) >=200 cd/m2
Field of View H90°@ 24” x V30°@ 24”
Screen Dimensions 40.8”W x 12.8”H (flat)
Pixel Pitch 0.36mm, 71 DPI
Aspect Ratio 3.2:1
Weight (without stand) 45 lbs.

http://www.necdisplay.com/NewTechnologies/CurvedDisplay/

 

[mitch212k]

oh dear .. alienware copy much

 

[EDDS]

how much? is all i wanna know

 

[kablooey]

how much? is all i wanna know

oh it's a bargin at just $6,499 heh...

 

[jammir]

i wouldnt want that?

 

[Sylver123]

Looks ok for gaming and watching movies but I think doing windows desktop work like web surfing and other things you do in windows would look weird because of the length of it.

 

[Aod]

only 900 Vertical pixels?

also, the 0.02ms response time suggests OLED. how long will a screen like this last?

if i could have any screen in the world, i'd have an IBM T221.
3840×2400 pixels in a 22" widescreen - thats 204pixels-per-inch, double that of an ordinary monitor.

who needs antialiasing when individual pixels are too small to see

 

[gt_junkie]

Think it's rear projection rather than OLED.

Saw a video of it and at certain angles areas of the screen dim just like a projection set.

Would be ok for gaming but i'd find 900 pixels a bit restrictive for anything else.

gt

 

[Aod]

Think it's rear projection rather than OLED.

Saw a video of it and at certain angles areas of the screen dim just like a projection set.

Would be ok for gaming but i'd find 900 pixels a bit restrictive for anything else.

gt

oh yeah, look at the other one in the 2nd picture. very deep back.