Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Whats the rest of your system and what do you need this pc for?
You compare items that are not on the same price level.
![]()
A 4770 makes more sense than a 2600K but both are twice as much than a FX8350 for +20% (4770) or same (2600K) the performance. (still the FX has 8 cores)
If money wasn't an issue, I would propose a 4930K. But that is twice as much as a 4770 for ~20% the perfomance.![]()
Because Asus boards have auto overclocking profiles, could just get a 4770K, then set it to 4.4GHZ with CPU level up and then forget about it.
I wouldn't run a stock i7 with a 780.
That's just me.
Say you add a second? You'll bottleneck loads, and you've got a locked i7 so there goes your resale value and options.
You could SLI on that setup and not bottleneck it.![]()
Money aside, yes 4771 is great, and no need to overclock it at all to use it with 1 or 2 GTX780. (or 290X).
That is was saying before, however my post was lost on FX8350 vs 4770 argument, without taking money as consideration.
If you can afford a 4771, then get it.
Fair enough, I guess it's up to the OP to decide if he's willing to pay more and willing to overclock.
FX-8350 just doesn't cut it imo, the likelihood that future games will use 8 weak cores is still at the mercy of devs, I'd go with a 4+ core multi-threaded Intel CPU. If devs don't implement 8 cores when coding games and software the GPU's will be majorly bottlenecked.