I thought this had gone away after the "spike" in cases of #MeToo claims when a bunch of girls who'd presumably drunk a bit too in various cities decided that they too had been jabbed with a needle, strangely these all occurred within days of each other following some press reports.
Now it's on the BBC website again:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-59959694
There is an explanation thrown in too as there is the obvious question of why would someone spike girls and then... nothing happens to them other than the claimed effect of being spiked (which is rather similar to getting very drunk).
Strangely enough despite all these incidents, there doesn't seem to have been a single person caught? Unless I've perhaps missed that? Presumably, the nightclubs themselves have CCTV yet I've not heard anything about even CCTV footage of an unknown suspect being seen "spiking" someone with a needle. It doesn't even seem particularly practical - spiking, where it occurs, is most commonly done with alcohol.
Though when studied it's turned out that claims of spiking are often false - the vast majority of the time someone claiming to have been spiked just got too drunk. This sort of claim is taking it one step further... none of them seem to claim to have seen anyone inject them, the claims are that they woke up and are adamant they were spiked and then found a small mark on their leg etc..
Yet there doesn't seem to be much in the way of critical coverage of this. Are journalists to worried about causing outrage if they question the obvious post "#MeToo" - the right on stance is to "believe women: etc...
Now it's on the BBC website again:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-59959694
A parliamentary committee also heard calls for more staff training, easier ways to report attacks and spiking to be made a specific offence.
The House of Commons' Home Affairs Committee opened an inquiry into spiking incidents in December.
Ms Owen, a French and Spanish student at the University of Nottingham, said she went with her friends to Pryzm nightclub in Nottingham city centre, but cannot remember anything else from the evening.
She said she was found on her own in a takeaway, and in the morning found a pin ***** mark on her leg.
There is an explanation thrown in too as there is the obvious question of why would someone spike girls and then... nothing happens to them other than the claimed effect of being spiked (which is rather similar to getting very drunk).
While speaking to MPs, she was asked about what she thought was the motivation for the attack.
She said: "For humour, for comedic effect.
"It's a question I have asked myself - what's the gain from this, what drives somebody to inject somebody with a drug?
"It's a sadistic feeling someone must have, to do it for fun when it is so dangerous.
"It's mind-blowing someone could drive themselves to that act."
Strangely enough despite all these incidents, there doesn't seem to have been a single person caught? Unless I've perhaps missed that? Presumably, the nightclubs themselves have CCTV yet I've not heard anything about even CCTV footage of an unknown suspect being seen "spiking" someone with a needle. It doesn't even seem particularly practical - spiking, where it occurs, is most commonly done with alcohol.
Though when studied it's turned out that claims of spiking are often false - the vast majority of the time someone claiming to have been spiked just got too drunk. This sort of claim is taking it one step further... none of them seem to claim to have seen anyone inject them, the claims are that they woke up and are adamant they were spiked and then found a small mark on their leg etc..
Yet there doesn't seem to be much in the way of critical coverage of this. Are journalists to worried about causing outrage if they question the obvious post "#MeToo" - the right on stance is to "believe women: etc...