Recently I purchased this monitor after extensive review of opinions on a variety of sites.
Although it is early days, I am disappointed with the quality of the image compared with either my old 17" NEC CRT, or the IBM laptop LCD. Colours seem metallic, harsh and flat with an artificial quality which I find quite unacceptable.
To be fair to the monitor I am running it at the moment on an old NVIDIA card which can barely manage 1280x1024. I am assemblling a new barebone system over the weekend (ASUS T2-AH1) with a much better integrated graphics system including DVI input and we will see what the performance of the monitor is with this new system.
Most posts seem to be about speed of response. I have seen little information on the quality of the image?
Kind regards,
John
Dr J M Evans
Although it is early days, I am disappointed with the quality of the image compared with either my old 17" NEC CRT, or the IBM laptop LCD. Colours seem metallic, harsh and flat with an artificial quality which I find quite unacceptable.
To be fair to the monitor I am running it at the moment on an old NVIDIA card which can barely manage 1280x1024. I am assemblling a new barebone system over the weekend (ASUS T2-AH1) with a much better integrated graphics system including DVI input and we will see what the performance of the monitor is with this new system.
Most posts seem to be about speed of response. I have seen little information on the quality of the image?
Kind regards,
John
Dr J M Evans