I have find Sage 50 and 200 ridiculously easy to use, and I was just wondering if that comment was from independent research or just a subjective statement from your observations. That said, other packages I've used include AS400 and SAP so compared to them, Sage might seem like a walk in the park I suppose.
If you honestly find Sage 50/200 "ridiculously" easy, I'd guess that at the very least you have a pretty good knowledge of formal double-entry bookkeeping - yes, knowing the basics will be helpful whichever package you use, but IME Sage does absolutely nothing to simplify the process for anyone coming to it cold.
I last used it (Line50 that is) a few years ago when I did my own books, and I found it a miserable chore at best, with a horrible, antiquated, unintuitive GUI which seemed to go out of its way to make everything as laborious and time-consuming as possible. It was also *extremely* unforgiving - if you made a mistake, usually the only way to correct the situation without ending up in a worse mess was to restore from the last backup and start again.
I suppose much of its inflexibility is deliberate, to establish a rock solid audit trail, but I'd prefer to feel that my accounts software was designed to make *my* life easier, not that of an HMRC inspector.
I haven't personally used the very latest versions though; maybe it's a bit friendlier these days.
Not sure which accountants you have been speaking to but most hate it (myself included). If it isn't used properly, which most don't know how, then you might as well scrap everything and redo it from scratch.
I haven't spoken to that many, admittedly - my own accountant likes his clients to use it, and when I told him how much I hated it, you'd have thought I'd told him he had a particularly ugly wife (which he does, incidentally).