FWIW I think that's a Furio interior, so it would be a 1.4.
It says 1.1 on the side

That looks like scrappy fodder to me. Hope it goes in your favour. His insurance will probably be void being he was intoxicated

FWIW I think that's a Furio interior, so it would be a 1.4.
It says 1.1 on the side
That looks like scrappy fodder to me. Hope it goes in your favour. His insurance will probably be void being he was intoxicated![]()
i'm pretty sure its voided in terms of his claim - ie the DD will get no payout, but the insurance will be valid as 3rd party only so the OP would get a payout.
They do tend to start drinking early in Scotland you know![]()
No! ): Yours are! ..or would be had you used oneYour smileys are the wrong way round!
Glad you're ok mate, should be open and shut case with him being smashed!
Hope you're alright - the car looks like it's held up pretty well compared to some crash tests/pictures I've seen of Saxos before, how fast were the cars going?
Glad you're ok, and hope they throw the book at him. I have nothing but contempt for people who drink and drive.
Do you remember exactly what happened? Or was it just that he came screaming round a corner and "got" you?
Ouch sounds bad. Could they prove he was doing excessive speed? It's a tough call as of course coming from a minor to major road is always looked at as a higher risk manoeuvre - I hope you don't get backlash for this, as from what you say it's hard to say that it's your fault. Do you reckon that if he'd been doing 30 he'd have been able to stop on time?
So you pulled out into the path of a vehicle? Granted he was probably going too fast, but unless it can be proved he was going too fast, i think the insurance will favour him.
Also, he wasn't a drunk driver either.
It sounds that way, yes. But I didn't really pull out infront of it as it was never there for me to pull out infront of until I had already done it.
I only found out he passed his breath test after I had posted that. He had just been to an 18th party and he said he'd had a drink so I just assumed.
[TW]Fox;15427983 said:Hang on - he was on the major road and you pulled out into his path?
[TW]Fox;15428133 said:I didn't realise you had a VASCAR device fitted to your car to enable you to tell how fast he was going.
Unfortunately, you pulled out into his path, so he hit you. He had right of way and you cannot prove how fast he was travelling (Not least because you don't actually know).
Unless he admits liability I cannot see this going any other way than your fault.