New Build Spec

Soldato
Joined
7 Jan 2004
Posts
5,793
Location
North London
Well basically the above, got £1000 to mess around with over my aging computer. I need pretty much everything bar monitor(19" but will be replacing it in a few months or when i've got the cash to do it) and keyboard/mouse/speakers are sorted aswell.

I play quite a few games, so will mainly be used as a gaming machine.

My current spec's are letting me down a fair bit, 2500+ barton clocked to 3200+ speeds, 1gig ram, rad 9800 pro etc so need a big upgrade which will last me a few years.
 
Truthfully though is a quad the way to go? I know they are dropping in price, maybe not as cheap as the e6600 but would it be worth it over a duo considering that im mainly gaming would the other cores actually be usefull to me? Also i'd need a good heatsink.
 
Yeah i know the quad is dropping in price, don't get me wrong but won't the other cores not be used at all? Which will be a waste, hence me asking on here for helping choosing a spec.

I was all set for a e6600 a few weeks to a month back, still am actually but with the quads coming down quite a bit it changes things. Im just thinking that a quad will be wasted for what i use it for. Maybe if i did programming or designing other cores would be more usefull but i don't really.
 
paul_64l said:
specultra.jpg


if its for gaming u gotta get an ultra

See now that looks good, but no seperate sound card, no heatsink etc. I can't at no costs go over £1000 due to the fact im trying to save but making it hard for myself.
 
Alex UK said:
Personally, I would go with something like this...




This way, you'll be able to get a 8800GTX in there. You'll also have two WD 320GB drives in RAID0, which will be very fast indeed. A decent sound card, and also a Noctua will provide you with very good sound and cooling. The rest is all very high quality stuff.

Now that is something im looking for. I'd be interested in the quad's but to be honest, i think a duo would be better as a quad wouldn't be used as well.

Don't know about the gtx though - i heard it was only a little clocked up compared to the one below and the price is pretty hefty considering the little difference, may downgrade to the version below it.
 
stickroad said:
What will you be doing on your pc, just playing games? If so no need for a Quad,.

Who told you that? Depending on what Res you play at the GTX is above any GPU out their, and is not just clocked a little above the GTS. :D

Yeah pretty much playing games, surfing the net a bit of web page designing etc. Nothing major enough to make use of quad cores. Is it worth waiting until the 22nd still for the e6600 or maybe e6700 or get it now?

I might be thinking of the ultra lol. Well im sticking with my samsung 19" atm, in the future will upgrade it but my pc needs more of an upgrade than my screen atm.

Do you think it would be an idea to get 4gig ram, or stick with the 2 gig?
 
Last edited:
paul_64l said:
4gb is only good for vista 64 really

I suppose i could upgrade in the future at a smaller price aswell then :).

Well i think i'll go with the spec that stickroad suggested then. Is the noctua a good heatsink then or would something else be better?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom