New Coretemp v0.97

fornowagain · 6 Mar 2008 at 02:13

http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/

- Add: Vista x64 support - All drivers are now digitally signed!
- Add: Logitech G15 keyboard support - see ReadMe!.txt for details.
- Add: Support 45nm LGA775 Xeon series.

- Fix: Opaque background in system tray wasn't 16x16 pixels.
- Fix: Yonah based CPUs incorrectly detected.
- Fix: 1333FSB Dual Core Conroe based Xeon incorrectly detected.
- Fix: Dreaded cycle of "Driver can't load" messages if driver failed to load.
- Fix: Socket AM2 Athlon-FX was not recognized.

- Change: Core Temp layout on a Phenom.

helmutcheese · 6 Mar 2008 at 02:24

GeForce · 6 Mar 2008 at 07:32

Fantastic. Thanks

siege2 · 6 Mar 2008 at 07:54

nice, thank u for posting :-)

JediFragger · 6 Mar 2008 at 08:13

Awesome, esp about the G15 applet - Thanks! :cool:

tyranus · 6 Mar 2008 at 08:41

Thank god, been waiting for this to work with vista

w3bbo · 6 Mar 2008 at 08:47

Cool - no more F8 for me

Deluxe1 · 6 Mar 2008 at 08:52

Like xmas has come early now it finally has vista64 support!

bikes · 6 Mar 2008 at 10:52

Deluxe1 said:
Like xmas has come early

I would'nt go as far as that matey lol

Ta for the heads up fornowagain.

helmutcheese · 6 Mar 2008 at 11:33

Was too tired to say b4, all good new build for Vista64 pity it cant read a Wolfdale accuratly

.

Stonedofmoo · 6 Mar 2008 at 12:34

According to this article these programs are not accurate at reading Intel temps

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3251&p=4

tyranus · 6 Mar 2008 at 13:56

So which is the most accurate to use?? :confused:

helmutcheese · 6 Mar 2008 at 13:57

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17848893

tyranus · 6 Mar 2008 at 14:36

Thanks for that

Hesky82 · 6 Mar 2008 at 15:19

The method in which Real Temp obtains a temperature reading is said to be more accurate.
I have to agree after testing it on all my Core and Core 2 systems it seems far less hit and miss than Coretemp.

Slinwagh · 6 Mar 2008 at 17:35

No more having to mess around to get it to work in Vista x64!

On a 32 bit machine I have RealTemp are CoreTemp give me the same readings so I am happy to keep using CoreTemp.

helmutcheese · 6 Mar 2008 at 17:38

Thats cause you dont have a Wolfdale

Jokester · 6 Mar 2008 at 17:40

Don't Real Temp and Core Temp both work in the same way? Just that they use different TJmax values?

helmutcheese · 6 Mar 2008 at 17:46

Read the full info I posted in that thread m8, its a lot and its deep but Im sure you will understand why he claims what he does.

littledave · 6 Mar 2008 at 18:10

At last 64 bit support