New D-Tek GFX Uni-Sink for 8800gtx

Caporegime
Joined
27 Nov 2005
Posts
25,492
Location
Guernsey
yhst-65556269779593_1952_49780990.jpg


yhst-65556269779593_1952_49680152.jpg



Specifications:

Model name: D-Tek GFX UNI-Sink
Compatibility: Nvidia™ GeForce 8800GTX
Material: Aluminum


Description:

The UNI-Sink is a one piece, easy to install solution designed to cool the nvidia™ GeForce 8800 GTX memory and voltage mosfets in one easy bolt-on package. It is designed to optimize as much surface area as possible and to eliminate individual heatsink applications to each memory chip. Easier to install and less expensive than alternatives, the UNI-sink is a great product for adequate 8800 GTX cooling (especially when paired with the D-Tek Fuzion GFX GPU cooler).

The UNI-Sink works in tandem with the FuZion GFX block for an outstanding combination of cooling performance without the expense and lack of upgradeability of full cover card specific waterblocks. The UNI-Sink is also compatible with existing non-full-cover waterblocks as well.

Features:

• High amount of surface area for excellent thermal control
• One-piece design or easy installation
• Full coverage for Memory, Voltage Mosfets and I/O chip
• Lightweight Construction
• Designed to work in tandem with the FuZion GFX Waterblock
• Uses existing OEM mounting hardwa
 
Last edited:
It reminds me of the heatsink on my old Pentium 2 cartridge, which now makes a great, if geeky, paperweight! :cool:

Ahh, 350Mhz of ultimate power...

PK!
 
Well, I think you have to admire the attempt, but compared to an Acetal-topped EK 8800 series block that looks very crude indeed.
 
WJA96 said:
Well, I think you have to admire the attempt, but compared to an Acetal-topped EK 8800 series block that looks very crude indeed.
I already ordered my EK 8800gtx fullcover waterblock last sunday :D ....
 
chaparral said:
I already ordered my EK 8800gtx fullcover waterblock last sunday :D ....

What - like this? :p Except for a GTX - obviously ;)

ekfc8800gts.jpg


Quality.
 
Last edited:
w3bbo said:
Prefer my acrylic EK GTX block :p

It looks lovely - that is true, but I've twice cracked acrylic covers on EK blocks because the screw-holes don't have enough 'meat' around about them. I swear I'm not monkey-wrenching them (honest!).

The acetal is virtually unbreakable and it looks pretty flash too.
 
WJA96 said:
What - like this? :p Except for a GTX - obviously ;)

Quality.

Yes,,,,,When the postman gets around to delivering it :(

(it meant to been posted by RMSD (nextday),,But the seller went and posted it by city link :mad: ..which can take weeks if they don't loose it)
am in channel islands and we don't have city link over here..so it can take ages when something does get posted by city link..
 
Last edited:
Jaffa_Cake said:
Not for the GTS then. How many is there for the GTX? and still none for the GTS.

Do you mean the D-Tek bodge job thingy or an EK full cover block? I have a EK full cover GTS block on mine and it is excellent. I can't see the D-Tek bodge job being that good. We need to see some reviews first.
 
because it's direct GPU cooling - so the cooling is where it matters.

EK blocks have never been high performance, the internals of his blocks have not got enough surface area - although he has set up a new CNC machine.

Stealth also had GTX base, so will be better than MCW60 which in turn turns up better than EK full cover.

Yet my list above was in terms of looks, I'm sure the DTEK block will out perform the EK block too.
 
Mekrel said:
because it's direct GPU cooling - so the cooling is where it matters.

EK blocks have never been high performance, the internals of his blocks have not got enough surface area - although he has set up a new CNC machine.

Stealth also had GTX base, so will be better than MCW60 which in turn turns up better than EK full cover.

Yet my list above was in terms of looks, I'm sure the DTEK block will out perform the EK block too.

That's a very interesting point. Tomorrow (it's too late now) I'm going to try and work out the surface area and heat transfer capacity of the D-Tek and EK blocks as one of the reasons I think the EK blocks are very good is they have relatively large water volumes. The D-Tek block will require a decent flow of air over the finned cooler and I think a decent air flow is hard to find in that area of many cases.

It's completely arbitrary of course as I have the EK Blocks now and swapping them would be too expensive to be sensible (£25 for a CPU block is disposable - £140 for a pair of GPU blocks would be an excessive extravagance), so I'll keep them.
 
I'm interested in memory performance, seeing how much more you can get from water if that is the case.

How ever, I think good airflow over sinks will squeeze the most out of memory.
 
When I briefly looked at overclocking the memory, I found there wasn't much headroom. My watercooling is about to be reshuffled, so that it can handle a huge build up of heat, which is what I get when I run ATi Tool for a few hours. If that happens I might see a bit more from the memory. I'm using the AquaComputer block above, and it does have a small flow of water over the memory - not a huge amount, just passes above those sections of the block, most of the restriction is in the GPU section. But when I've been running for a few hours producing as much heat as possible, the only warm part on the block is directly above the GPU.
 
Back
Top Bottom