Caporegime
with 59bhp, it wont feel faster than the 0-60 of 16.9 suggests. It will be as dire as the figures make out. Less than 60 hp/ tonne is terrible !!
What difference does it make if it feels fast or not. It's slow.

Any reason you're not looking at the TDCI engines? Residuals are far better if you're buying new.
The difference between a Zetec and a Zetec S is the bodykit. Thats it.
I bought a 1.6 TDCI Zetec in 2009. Was a really great car and considering the amount of miles I put on it, it held its value really well.
The Zetec S would have held its value even better, however having 5 doors were more important to me.
Any reason you're not looking at the TDCI engines? Residuals are far better if you're buying new.
I currently have a 2005 Clio 1.5 dCi Dynamique (65bhp) but it's starting to need more and more money spending on it so I decided I should use this opportunity to upgrade.
Is your current Clio going to cost more than £160 a month to keep on the road?
It seems daft buying a brand new car just because your current car is needing the odd repair.
"Be aware that the current 1.25 is a LOT slower than the previous 1.25s. It now takes 16.9 seconds to 60 and flat out it'll do 94mph"
Apparently.
It's not really the odd repair. It needs a new EGR valve, cam belt and service so £800+. I've had it for two years and fancy a change.

It's not really the odd repair. It needs a new EGR valve, cam belt and service so £800+. I've had it for two years and fancy a change.
has to be the 1.6.
1.2 will be painful, unless its ONLY used around town. If you want to use it on the motorway, and try to get into the BMW lane a 1.2 just wont cut it.
hmm im sure the 1.25 was 75bhp.... How can it only be 59bhp now? detuned for tax/emissions? The new Fiesta is lighter so the 110bhp in the 1.6 makes it almost as fast as a bog standard Mk6 Fiesta ST.
.a clio has a horrible French interior where as the new fiesta has a much better insides... hardly similar.
