new hard disk shoes only as unallocated

Soldato
Joined
16 Sep 2005
Posts
7,886
Location
What used to be a UK
new hard disk shows only as unallocated

Just installed a third sata disk and i assumed it would just be a simple matter for vista to detect and then me to format. It only shows up as unallocated in admin tools etc and I do not ge the option to format. The new disk does not show in computer (vista 64) but the other two do along with my dvd drives. I haven't a clue about this and so any help regarding its recognition and formatting would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
You need to partition the drive before you can format it, you can do this in admin tools under disk management.
 
Hello Dolph. The only option I have in admin tools is one for new simple volume when I right click on it. A wizard pops ups asking me to either accept the default size or manually insert it. Is this the one I need to use ?
 
Yep, that's the one. Select the default size and it should create a partition that fills the whole drive, then you can format it.
 
Uh oh! just noticed the new drive is formatting as a raw drive as no other option was given or available. On 48% at the moment. Other two drives are ntfs, but the new drive seems to show 44 gig as missing from its total size?
 
Oh right! Thank you once again.
Edit :Must be the way vista sees it because if you boot into xp with the same drive it immediately provides the option ntfs.
 
Last edited:
Hehe: apologies for the spelling. Flustered because the entire process took so long. Hopefully some faster way of formatting might be on the horizon for when we get even larger hard drives?
 
Saw the option though opted for a full format which is why it took so long. Had no idea that a quick format would have sufficed :(
What really is the point of having a full option if its more convenient to use the quick option?
 
Saw the option though opted for a full format which is why it took so long. Had no idea that a quick format would have sufficed :(
What really is the point of having a full option if its more convenient to use the quick option?

AFAIK a full format scans the disc for errors while it does it.
 
So on a new drive-which it was, I'd have been better chosing the quick format tab-sigh.
 
AFAIK a full format scans the disc for errors while it does it.

+1. Very true. Got a call from a mate few years back. Windows setup kept crashing. A quick format wasnt detecting a bad sector until he did a full format. I never use quick format unless I'm doing a virtual machine install.
 
never quick format a new drive. the formatting process is the easiest way of seeing whether the drive has bad sectors. if it does, send it back as faulty.

i'd only ever quick-format a drive i knew to have no bad sectors.
 
never quick format a new drive. the formatting process is the easiest way of seeing whether the drive has bad sectors. if it does, send it back as faulty.

i'd only ever quick-format a drive i knew to have no bad sectors.

catch 22 then :) New drive not been checked before therefore you do not know if it has any bad sectors (for certain). Formatting on an extremely large drive takes ages.
 
Back
Top Bottom