• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New Q9650 chip limited by mobo -.- my experience

Associate
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Posts
2,224
Location
127.0.0.1
Hi people

Against every sane nerve in my body, I decided to upgrade my cpu (then a 2.8Ghz E6300 @3.675Ghz on stock volts) to a Q9650.
It is mainly used for encoding. Anyway, I got the chip and started OCing it, I never go past stock voltage (ever!). I planned use the chip to break the 4GHz barrier.

I set the FSB to 400MHz straight away which got me 3.6Ghz and passed IBT so I continued. Next I tried 450MHz for 4GHz, my pc didn't boot. Lowered to 440, still didnt boot. I kept lowering it until it got to 410, finally it booted and passed IBT on maximum.

I tried 415MHz and my PC didn't boot so I raised the voltage to 1.3V, still no boot. I then came accross a review of my mobo, stating that the FSB was limited to 410MHz:mad:.

Getting a new mobo is out of the question because spending ~£90 for an extra 400MHz on the cpu seems a waste (so was getting the cpu but anyway), also cannot be bothered to do a clean install. So I decided to make the most of what I had. Also I don't plan anymore upgrades for at least the next 3 years.

I lowered the FSB to 400MHz to play it safe and started undervolting the chip. I was astonished with the results bearing in mind I am only using the stuff in my sig:

Q9650@ 3.6GHz|Win 7 Pro
Corsair 2X2GB PC6400 XMS2 Pro|Akasa Nero|
Gigabyte GA-P43-ES3G|Gainward Radeon 4870 1GB GS
Antec TruePowerNew 650W|NZXT Tempest|500GB Samsung F1

Look at the voltage! Now I have to live with not being able to untap the full potential of the chip:(

quadocsmall.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom