New wu F@H

[Steevo38]

[06:03:35] *------------------------------*
[06:03:35] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[06:03:35] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[06:03:35]
[06:03:35] Preparing to commence simulation
[06:03:35] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[06:03:35] - Not checking prior termination.
[06:03:41] - Expanded 3981167 -> 20311645 (decompressed 510.1 percent)
[06:03:41] - Starting from initial work packet
[06:03:41]
[06:03:41] Project: 1497 (Run 0, Clone 110, Gen 2)
[06:03:41]
[06:03:41] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[06:03:41] Entering M.D.
[06:03:49] Protein: p1497_TETHERED VESICLES

Sounds rather painful!

It's a 364 pointer so fingers crossed that the ppd are good.

Fold on team.

Steevo

 

[oceaness]

VETHERED TESICLES

 

[rich99million]

These are closely related to the p1495 WUs but someone has said they seem to fold faster giving even better PPD!!!


What you getting so far on it?

 

[lay-z-boy]

lol @ the protein name

 

[shadowscotland]

for thoses intrested in the 'science' of this stuff see below

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1300179&blobtype=pdf

For those that don't here's my paraphrased defernition

Vesicle - a relatively small and enclosed compartment within a cell.
Think very small ballon inside a cell
/-\
\_/
tethered - take that ballon, now pinch the side and pull to form a long hollow projection. Cells or organells (like a vesicle) can get like this for a number of reasons and the state is called tethered.

/-\
\_====| (this end is usually attach to something aka tethered but not always)

 

[Unforgiven]

A nicely paraphrased definition Shadow, thanks.

I really had to do a double take when looking at the protein name though...

 

[BillytheImpaler]

insightful scientific response

That's all very nice, yes, but I think I'd rather say...


fnar fnar! TETHERED VESICLES! fnar!

 

[Steevo38]

These are closely related to the p1495 WUs but someone has said they seem to fold faster giving even better PPD!!!


What you getting so far on it?

Project : 1497
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364


-- OPTY1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 37s - 415.45 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 32s - 387.31 ppd


Thats on one core of my Opty 165 @ 2.7
Slightly slower than the 1495's but still pretty good.

Thanks to shadowscotland for the scientific bit.

 

[kinnison]

Project : 1497
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364


-- Chris 4 --

Min. Time / Frame : 26mn 34s - 197.30 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 27mn 29s - 190.72 ppd


But that's on a Sempron 2300, so it's better than any other wu I've seen on there. (I think the 600 pointers get about 170 ppd on that PC)