Nick Griffin, speaks the truth for a change?

Moses99p said:
Who verifies the credibility of these thirty one thousand people? I could print this form off and post it in saying I have a PhD... http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWPetition.pdf :eek:
Click to expand...

I could also ask, who verifies the credibility of the IPCC ones?

Considering Climategate, i'd rather put my faith in the OISM then IPCC.

Besides, i would have thought they'd check your name to see if your registered as a PhD or not.
 
oli collett said:
When you're siding on an argument with Nick Griffin, who is claiming that there's a global conspiracy of some sorts, it really is time to seek medical help.
Click to expand...

When you start believing the crap your spoon fed through Rupert Murdochs media empire, then you need to start seeking help.
 
Evangelion said:
And yet... the last petition listed Mickey Mouse, the Spice Girls and all sorts of nonsense.

So until I see ironclad proof that every name on this alleged 31,000 list is legitimate, I'll feel free to ignore it.
Click to expand...

But you mention nothing of the Wiki link?

Expected better from you.
 
mcast123 said:
Let's face it Teki, you couldn't care less about climate change, you just have a massive hard on for anything that you believe is a conspiracy. You spend your life on forums, digging for anything that could be construed as a conspiracy. You then switch your brain off and mindlessly believe any old garbage that's written on the net.
Click to expand...

Quite the opposite, but if trying to degrade me makes you feel better, go right ahead :)

I have news for you, we all understand politicians don't tell the truth, companies are greedy, the media can be biased and money is a great motivator, it's been happening since Roman times. You just seem to take any of this common sense stuff and blow it out of all proportion because you're mentally ill.
Click to expand...

If we know its true, why do people still think MSM is the best source for news? Why do people allow companies to be so greedy and why dont we start changing our political system?

On the subject of climate change, we get it, scientists on both sides have agendas for funding and aren't telling the unbiased truth. I ask you this, even if your "climategate overlord lizards" are telling lies, isn't it a good thing that we at least try and use renewable energy, no matter the motivation?
Click to expand...

No idea were the lizards come from....

Anyway, I've never disputed using renewable energy is a bad thing, nor we shouldn't try to use it, i dispute the tax increases in the name of man made global warming, the blame shifting from the government from big industry to people who drive cars and have more then 2 lights on in there house.

In a previous thread i've said we contribute to CC, but no where near the levels were being told, should we stop land filling, rubbish burning and tree cutting, of course, but that isnt what people think of when they think climate change.
 
stockhausen said:
As to the petition involving the 30,000+ American "Scientists" (who may or may not know anything worthwhile about man's impact on climate change), it was started by a Christian Fundamentalist who also happens to believe in Creationism and I would dearly love to see evidence of the scientific rigour applied to the list of signatories.
Click to expand...

Don't pigeon hole the anti IPCC scientists to the OIEM link, maybe try to come back with something to prove or discredit the people from the wiki link?

EDIT

Oh and the complete and utter irony of your sig, with the BBC as a source for an unbiased explanation of climate change. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom