Nikon D3200 close shot lens
- Thread starter sid-180
- Start date
What you are looking for are typically referred to as a Portrait lens and a Macro lens.
Nikon correctly call macro lenses Micro because the lenses are used to photograph small subjects than the macro sized world we normally photograph.
These aren't normally the same types of lenses. Portrait lenses tend to have a faster aperture, macro lenses are specially design to allow you to get closer to the subject and fill the frame, this comes at the cost of a slower focus system. That begin said you can use macro lenses for portraiture quite effectively so if you can only afford a single lens to do both tasks that is where I would look. The Nikon 60mm f/2.8 Macro would make a good portrait lens and has along enough focal length for some macro work on a crop body.
All true macro lenses will give the same 1:1 reproduction ratio, which means a subject in the real world that is 1cm big will take up 1cm on the sensor, so then knowing the sensor size you can see how much of the frame this will fill. It doesn't matter which focal length macro lens you use, all will do the same job. The difference is that longer focal length macro lenses allow you to be further way form the subject (called minimum focal distance MFD). For insects and things which can get scared you want to be as far away as possible but the longer lens are heavier, more expensive and harder to use.
For flowers obviously you can get very close.
For portraits you need to decide if you want full body length portraits, couples, small groups, indoor work - then the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G DX is perfect. If you want head and shoulders and close up details, or have space to work with then the the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 G or 85mm f/1.8 G are also good candidates. The 85mm is a little long but works for head and shoulds work if you are not too cramped. 50mm is somewhere in between.
Nikon correctly call macro lenses Micro because the lenses are used to photograph small subjects than the macro sized world we normally photograph.
These aren't normally the same types of lenses. Portrait lenses tend to have a faster aperture, macro lenses are specially design to allow you to get closer to the subject and fill the frame, this comes at the cost of a slower focus system. That begin said you can use macro lenses for portraiture quite effectively so if you can only afford a single lens to do both tasks that is where I would look. The Nikon 60mm f/2.8 Macro would make a good portrait lens and has along enough focal length for some macro work on a crop body.
All true macro lenses will give the same 1:1 reproduction ratio, which means a subject in the real world that is 1cm big will take up 1cm on the sensor, so then knowing the sensor size you can see how much of the frame this will fill. It doesn't matter which focal length macro lens you use, all will do the same job. The difference is that longer focal length macro lenses allow you to be further way form the subject (called minimum focal distance MFD). For insects and things which can get scared you want to be as far away as possible but the longer lens are heavier, more expensive and harder to use.
For flowers obviously you can get very close.
For portraits you need to decide if you want full body length portraits, couples, small groups, indoor work - then the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G DX is perfect. If you want head and shoulders and close up details, or have space to work with then the the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 G or 85mm f/1.8 G are also good candidates. The 85mm is a little long but works for head and shoulds work if you are not too cramped. 50mm is somewhere in between.
That was the exact lens that was in the back of my mind and I just couldn't remember it. It is indeed, from a specification point of view, a perfect combo macro + portrait lens.
It's actually a really nice lens, AF in macro mode is, like every other macro lens not great.
Otherwise it's reasonably quick, accurate and very quiet. Sharp, cheap and fairly well made too.
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/tamron-sp-af-60mm-f-2-diii-macro-1-1-lens-review-16268
Otherwise it's reasonably quick, accurate and very quiet. Sharp, cheap and fairly well made too.
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/tamron-sp-af-60mm-f-2-diii-macro-1-1-lens-review-16268
so expensive, might have to wait for two months, as i have just bought the tamron 18-270mm and a tripod, flash and two batteries this month or the Mrs will shoot me.
or if anyone knows where i can buy it for sub £300 i could get away with it and buy it.
or if anyone knows where i can buy it for sub £300 i could get away with it and buy it.
Last edited:
The D lens wont auto-focus on your camera and even if it did I don't recommend it compared to the 35mm f/1.8G or 50mm f/1.8G(AF-S)