no wifi modem router

Well, JasonM, the great thing in life is that eventually all becomes known.

I would just say that the ‘evidence’ of the lady with the Mobile Phone in her bra makes me especially skeptical simply because who do you know who has had the same mobile phone for 10 years?

And you’ve simply not come up with anything whatsoever to substantiate any claims about people being able to sense or be sensitive to 2.4GHz radio frequency waves.
 
The fact remains that's insurance companies including Loyds will not underwrite telecom's companies.

Lloyd’s isn’t an insurance company. It’s an insurance market where syndicates of names decide if they want to underwrite a KNOWN risk. The phenomenon you insist is real isn’t a proven risk so of course no-one is going to insure against it. How would you establish the market? What’s the likelihood it will happen?

Unfortunately because you are making such random baseless statements you come across as a tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theorist.

Believe me, if I thought for one moment my mobile phone was going to give me a brain tumour, I wouldn’t use it. Now, you might say “that’s what smokers in the 1950’s said” and you’d be correct with the proviso that I have access to proper scientific search engines and I did a literature search on this topic and everything I found said there was no significant hazard as long as the legal limits were adhered to and the equipment was used in the manner intended by the manufacturer.

If you were to make arguments about power lines, I’d be much more sympathetic, and there is evidence for electromagnetic fields having adverse health effects on people living under/near HT power lines. That’s a different form of radiation. Low power RF isn’t innately carcinogenic.
 
WJA96, you can't leave it can you.

When someone says there electro sensitive regardless if they are right I do at least respect what they say. Your opinion is no different to saying Dyslexia in the 1970/80's did not exist and ridiculing someone as being low iq, or no different to someone being dismissed for saying they had a skin allergy in the 1950's and it's only in there minds. So calling me what you did you have no respect, and your a bully.

I don't know if these technologies give a health risk or not, however especially with the coming roll out of 5G, if there is health issues the world has a big problem.

Over the Lloyds thing, even quoted the section from Lloyds for you.

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uplo...and-Insurance-Companies-Slides-EHT-6-2016.pdf

“The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.”

The lady with phone in bra is from here, it's a presentation from Dr Devra Davis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

Unfortunately because you are making such random baseless statements you come across as a tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theorist.

Talk about playing the man and not the ball. Your making a personal attack on me here, i'm not doing this to you or anyone else in this thread.

The United States is the most litigious country in the world. If there was a shred of valid evidence for what you say there would be a plethora of class action law suits in play right now. And there are none. Zero.

Below totally disproves your quote above.

Now there was a law suit in Italy that ruled that mobile phone use caused brain tumors. The main reason this was ruled as the judge would only accept independent evidence that predominately shows there are heath effects.

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...rt-rules-mobile-phone-use-caused-brain-tumour

This aside I posted one sentence on June 19, you and others have been on my case ever since, everything else I posted was only in response of someone else quoting me, I've been trolled in this thread, look at posts 16, 17, 33.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom