Noob question - Best kind of filter to use for a outdoor evening party

Soldato
Joined
20 Apr 2004
Posts
4,383
Location
Oxford
I was about to put in a order for some bits and bobs online. One of these items will be a lens filter or two for my NEX-C3 with the bundled SEL1855 lens.

Never used a filter before and was wondering what would be better to use for an outdoor party I'm attending next week (late afternoon to evening/night).

I was going to pick up a UV filter, but considering paying for a Polarizing and or Polarizing + UV filter as well.

Thank for your help in advance.
 
The last thing you'll want will be to remove light entering your lens. I would be thinking more about lens selection. Maybe carry a hood if the sun is low in the sky (unless you're into lens flare)
 
Unless you have a specific effect you're trying to achieve with filters, there's no reason to use one, particularly as most modern digital cameras will have their own UV filter covering the sensor.

The main argument for purchasing a UV filter is that it can provide additional protection for the front element of the lens. This might be a consideration if it's a boisterous party where people will be bumping into you, or beer is flying around. The small outlay for a UV filter is better than replacing a lens.

The main thing you'll have to consider will be the light falling away as the party progresses and there are three things you can do to combat this:

  • Provide your own light source - invariably this means adding flash. The drawback to this is that it can make your photos look flat as the extra light swamps the foreground, leaving the background dark. Once the sun goes down, you won't really have an alternative though.
  • Increase the camera's sensitivity - this means increasing the ISO setting on your camera. You can either leave this to the camera if it has an Auto ISO setting, or adjust it manually. The downside is that a higher ISO setting will introduce more "noise" into the image but that may be an acceptable alternative to flash around dusk.
  • Use a faster lens - around f/1.8 or better. The larger aperture will ensure that more light reaches the sensor, resulting in higher shutter speeds. Unfortunately these faster lenses tend to be more expensive although there are fast primes available for most DSLR camera makes.
Invariably it will come down to using a combination of all three methods. Stick with a prime lens throughout the event, bump up the ISO when the light begins to fade, and add flash when there's no natural light available.

A polarising filter is useful for cutting down on reflections and boosting the intensity of colours, but it will reduce the amount of light reaching the sensor, typically by around 2 stops. So it's worth getting one for landscapes but it will be useless for your party. If you do decide to get one for future use, make sure it's circular so your camera can automatically adjust the exposure.
 
^^^
As an aside, digital cameras don't have a UV sensor, they just aren't at all responsive to the UV end of the spectrum, unlike file which is and gets a blueish haze with high UV. They do have an IR filter because they are very responsive to IR wavelength and without it would quickly saturate the red channel.
 
In today's world of DSLRs, "UV Filter" is synonymous with "lens guard" (to satisfy the semantic folk: "lens front element guard")
 
I've stuck with Hoya Pro-1 guards. I take it there isn't much in these in terms of difference to think about other brands?
 
Back
Top Bottom