Not sure which to get out of these two systems

Associate
Joined
9 Aug 2010
Posts
294
Location
Uk
So it's been a while (14 years) since I went shopping for pc parts. I've included two baskets here, one with a 5080 and the other with a 9070, though I'm not sure which one would suit me more. I plan on playing games such as Cities: Skylines 2, Battlefield 6, Forever Winter and Manor Lords to give a couple of examples.

My current monitor is 1440, though I plan on upgrading it within the next year or two. I'm open to constructive feedback on all the parts I have selected, as I'm going with brands I have previous experience with, which I appreciate might not be the best or most affordable anymore. Any help would be most appreciated.

My 5080 basket at OcUK:

Total: £3,254.80 (includes delivery: £0.00)​

or

My 9070 basket at OcUK:

Total: £2,784.79 (includes delivery: £0.00)​
 
Last edited:
Why do you need two PSUs? The games you play don't seem to feature heavy RT, so you might as well save £500 and put that towards a monitor.
 
Why do you need two PSUs? The games you play don't seem to feature heavy RT, so you might as well save £500 and put that towards a monitor.
Good spot. I won't need two PSUs haha will redo the baskets to show updated totals :D

Would a 9070XT be able to drive a 4k monitor and play the games I like to play at full whack?
 
Last edited:
The 5080 is about ~25% faster at 4K in raster (I say that, if/when you upgrade the monitor to a higher res than 1440p), though it can be higher than that with ray tracing enabled.

It depends on the game though, sometimes the 9070 XT is more competitive.

If you're happy with "good enough" performance and upgrading the card in 3-4 years (or when you do the monitor), then I'd just get the cheaper one. Dumping £1K on a 5080, when the Super replacement will get 8GB more VRAM is not something I'd be very keen on either.
 
The 5080 is about ~25% faster at 4K in raster (I say that, if/when you upgrade the monitor to a higher res than 1440p), though it can be higher than that with ray tracing enabled.

It depends on the game though, sometimes the 9070 XT is more competitive.

If you're happy with "good enough" performance and upgrading the card in 3-4 years (or when you do the monitor), then I'd just get the cheaper one. Dumping £1K on a 5080, when the Super replacement will get 8GB more VRAM is not something I'd be very keen on either.
Thanks for the advice, it hadn't occurred to me about a possible super coming out. going for the less expensive of the two would mean that I could also look at building a NAS as I'm going to be down sizing from a full size tower, and would like to get a smaller jonsbo case to pop on a shelf in the lounge.
 
going for the less expensive of the two would mean that I could also look at building a NAS as I'm going to be down sizing from a full size tower
There's also quite a few easy savings in your build if that's something you're prepared to do. The A3 doesn't need SFX PSUs, for example and the Phanteks AMP GH 850 would save you money, though if you're sticking with the AIO instead of a cheaper freezer 36/peerless assassin you'd need to check the GPU length supported by the case with the Phanteks. The A3 also supports MATX instead of ITX, which could make another £100-£150 saved.
 
Last edited:
The main thing that jumps out is the £360 for RAM

Most still use 32GB and this £150 kit would be fine I think and saves you £210

TeamGroup Delta RGB 32GB (2X16GB) DDR5 PC5-44800C30 6000MHz Dual Channel Kit - Black​

 
The main thing that jumps out is the £360 for RAM

Most still use 32GB and this £150 kit would be fine I think and saves you £210

TeamGroup Delta RGB 32GB (2X16GB) DDR5 PC5-44800C30 6000MHz Dual Channel Kit - Black​

And even if it's not enough, jumping up to a 48GB Kit would be preferable to spending that much on 96GB, half of which might as well die of old age before being put to any meaningful use.
 
Back
Top Bottom