Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,087
Yup, a 350W-ish sounds about right. PL will do it on its own but the undervolt will help to go lower when not much load on the system.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 4000 Series
- Thread starter MrClippy
- Start date
Perfect, glad to know im on the right line at least. I could get mine under 300w with a 70% PL but i noticed the core clock would drop quite abit in port royal resulting in a much lower score (about 1000 points difference). FPS wise it was a few as well so i think i'll stick with what i have right now, seems a good spot to be in.
Soldato
It varies from game to game but this is the result in Spiderman Remastered, Max settings, DLSS Quality, FG etc...
Stats on the left hand side, Wattage at the bottom of the stats.
Stock
Power level set to 70
Power level set to 70 + undervolt.
Stats on the left hand side, Wattage at the bottom of the stats.
Stock
Power level set to 70
Power level set to 70 + undervolt.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,087
I tried various settings and found that to be the best overall one for perf/power usage.
It varies from game to game but this is the result in Spiderman Remastered, Max settings, DLSS Quality, FG etc...
Stats on the left hand side, Wattage at the bottom of the stats.
Stock
Power level set to 70
Power level set to 70 + undervolt.
200w with the PL and undervolt is nuts but you do take quite a hit in performance though. Nice to see it can be achieved, i might try this setting on a game that runs stupid fps by lowering it to 200w. Would certainly save me a lot of unncessary heat generation.
Same i've been playing about with it for 2 days now but your settings seem to be the sweet spot. Learning how to undervolt this doesn't seem that different to how i did it on my 3090 come to think of it now.
Soldato
And in this specific game if you turn off frame generation and limit the FPS to 60 as 60 is perfectly playable, The power savings go down even further which in turn drops the heat output.
And in this specific game if you turn off frame generation and limit the FPS to 60 as 60 is perfectly playable, The power savings go down even further which in turn drops the heat output.
Almost seems a shame to drop it that low for such a beasty gpu
Tweaked abit more and it passed Port Royal at 950mv @2805mhz with an overclock on the memory +1000. Temps are a lot better
Nice. On separate note however.
Looks at sig. Looks at GPU.
Soldato
Almost seems a shame to drop it that low for such a beasty gpu
I lock FPS to 60 for a lot of games to keep my rig cool and quiet, For racing and FPS games though it's always unlocked.
Have many folks on here tried the cablemod angled adapters? I've recently bought a 4090(for the second time 
) and I'm unable to close the side panel currently but an adapter should fix this... But I'm just wondering are there any known issues with these or are they known for failing?
) and I'm unable to close the side panel currently but an adapter should fix this... But I'm just wondering are there any known issues with these or are they known for failing?
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2017
- Posts
- 922
Recently been looking at the CableMod Basics RT-Series 12VHPWR 90 Degree PCI-e Cable (not adapter - replacement cable.) I already got the modmesh standard cablemod cable, but this would be a lot cleaner. Doesn't look like they have versions other than 'basics' at the moment. No issues with the current cable I am using, other than a bit of a bend at the side panel, but not too severe.Have many folks on here tried the cablemod angled adapters? I've recently bought a 4090(for the second time
Hi Guys, just joined the club with a 4080 (my last Nvidia was a GTX 260 lol ) and was wondering if my undervolt was ok. Bought an MSI
I'm not looking at anything extreme, just wanted something nice and easy and I seem to have settle for 2700Mhz @ 0.940mV. I have to say that I'm amazed by how cool and how little power the card uses with this undervolt, so overall it seems good to me but I'd like to make sure that I'm not missing something. Thanks.
P.S: forgot to say, I went for an MSI Ventus 3x OC, the cheapest I could find.
I'm not looking at anything extreme, just wanted something nice and easy and I seem to have settle for 2700Mhz @ 0.940mV. I have to say that I'm amazed by how cool and how little power the card uses with this undervolt, so overall it seems good to me but I'd like to make sure that I'm not missing something. Thanks.
P.S: forgot to say, I went for an MSI Ventus 3x OC, the cheapest I could find.
Last edited:
Has this been posted?
www.youtube.com
Half-Life 2 RTX, An RTX Remix Project - Announce Trailer
Half-Life 2 RTX: An RTX Remix Project is a new community-made remaster of one of the highest-rated games of all time, Valve’s Half-Life 2. Half-Life 2 RTX is...
www.youtube.com
Has this been posted?
Half-Life 2 RTX, An RTX Remix Project - Announce Trailer
Half-Life 2 RTX: An RTX Remix Project is a new community-made remaster of one of the highest-rated games of all time, Valve’s Half-Life 2. Half-Life 2 RTX is...
Many times. It even has its dedicated thread.
Associate
Picked up a 4070 Ti gaming X trio for £679 brand new - 20% off + a further £50 at an online retailer.. i game at 4K and haven’t found any issues with it. Clocks to 2970mhz for games and +1725mhz on the VRAM for 587gb/s bandwidth - the games I play happily a locked 60fps at 4k maxed settings using anywhere from 120-300 watts depending on what games and how taxing it is.. for example Doom and days gone uses 150 watts and the fans remain 30% whilst the GPU sits at mid 50s temp wise. Much prefer over my 3090
Soldato
Why do they need to stick such huge coolers on these cards?
They run so cool as it is.
They run so cool as it is.
