• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA 4000 Series

So I’ve just read that some clever person has got frame generation working on 3000 series cards.

People reporting it works great.

Frame generation was the only reason for me to get a 4000 series card. Now I don’t need to. Happy days.
I've been testing the mod out today on my 3090 - see the FSR3 thread

I'm trying to update with basic findings as I go for various games. It's a bit hit or miss at the moment and yesterday it wouldn't work with HDR - but that's been fixed already! When it works well (like in Cyberpunk) it's superb, but some games have bad ghosting issues, and some games it's difficult or not possible to set up yet because of the file structures.
 
Last edited:
It was a mistake on their site, The original source confirmed it, I highly doubt Nvidia could keep that one under wraps but let the 4070, 4070 Ti and 4080 Supers info slide out so easily.

There's bound to be a new higher-end 4090 variant this year, as the 4090 only uses about 89% of the AD102 chip so a full one would be about 12% faster.

It'll be called a 4090Ti though, not 4090SUPER.
 
There's bound to be a new higher-end 4090 variant this year, as the 4090 only uses about 89% of the AD102 chip so a full one would be about 12% faster.

It'll be called a 4090Ti though, not 4090SUPER.

IMO they should bring back the Titan branding and forget any 4090Ti as it sounds silly but unlike their past fumbled releases from here on out only have the Titan branding on 100% fully enabled dies.
 
Last edited:
AFAIK Titan branding was sinked because it did not sell very well - people treated it as something above gaming cards and did not consider it. Marketing figured they just name it 3090 in line with gaming convention and it sold much better.
 
AFAIK Titan branding was sinked because it did not sell very well - people treated it as something above gaming cards and did not consider it. Marketing figured they just name it 3090 in line with gaming convention and it sold much better.

Yet the 3090 was explicitly marketed as a "Titan class" card and "not a gaming" one.
 
Just part of a boiling frog ;) 4090 is not marketed as titan class anymore
Would be hard to market it as a titan when it has less % of cuda cores to the full die than even the 80ti class.

Screenshot-359.png
 
Last edited:
Yeah there's no sense buying a 4070,4070Ti or 4080 right now.
Hey guys, my friend is so close to pulling the trigger on a 16gb 4060Ti. He has a very limited budget and really wants to stick as close as possible to £400, which is fairly possible.

Should he get this? I imagine the bus size is small but the frame buffer 16gb is useful, even though he is using for gaming at 1440p.

What do we reckon? Hold fire and wait till 4070 comes down in price, to give the extra horsepower or go with that card?

He is currently rocking a trusty 1060 6GB model, that has served well.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys, my friend is so close to pulling the trigger on a 16gb 4060Ti. He has a very limited budget and really wants to stick as close as possible to £400, which is fairly possible.

Should he get this? I imagine the bus size is small but the frame buffer 16gb is useful, even though he is using for gaming at 1440p.

What do we reckon? Hold fire and wait till 4070 comes down in price, to give the extra horsepower or go with that card?

He is currently rocking a trusty 1060 6GB model, that has served well.
I really don't like 4060 16GB and wouldn't recommend it. At settings where 16GB memory is useful, the card runs out of horsepower anyway.
4070 would be a better choice and it should come down next month, but will be nowhere near 400

At this pricepoint maybe 6750XT, 6800 if available. 7700XT has been getting very close to 400 recently and would be my first selection
Since this is Nvidia thread, maybe used 3080?
 
Last edited:
I really don't like 4060 16GB and wouldn't recommend it. At settings where 16GB memory is useful, the card runs out of horsepower anyway.
4070 would be a better choice and it should come down next month, but will be nowhere near 400

At this pricepoint maybe 6750XT, 6800 if available. 7700XT has been getting very close to 400 recently and would be my first selection
Since this is Nvidia thread, maybe used 3080?
Good info thanks.

So, way I see it. No to 4060Ti 16GB. No to 4070Ti.

Possibly yes to 4070, but still overpriced.

Cheapest model on OCUK £529 and competitive with other vendors.

I wonder how much it will come down early next year!
 
Last edited:
Good info thanks.

So, way I see it. No to 4060Ti 16GB. No to 4070Ti.

Possibly yes to 4070, but still overpriced.

Cheapest model on OCUK £529 and competitive with other vendors.

I wonder how much it will come down early next year!

I am on an RTX3060TI,and the RTX4060TI is one of the poorest cards Nvidia has ever launched. Its barely faster than what I have. At £400ish and under AMD is really the better option IMHO.

The RX6800 16GB is less than £400 now and the RX7700XT 12GB is heading towards £400. They are both around 20% faster at qHD. The RX6750XT is less than the cost of an RTX4060TI 8GB.

Also,the AMD dGPUs seem to be a bit less CPU bottlenecked than the Nvidia equivalent ones,if on an older/slower CPU.

You could wait and see if the RTX4070 Super launch pushes the RTX4070 closer to £400.

An RTX3080 might be an option but if you are spending over £300 on one it really should be with a decent warranty IMHO. Also it consumes quite a decent amount of power too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom