Enjoy your 24 fps then on a £1700 card.I'd rather be without DLSS 3 if having it enabled brings about vsync-like mouse movement latency elastics!
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/wink.gif)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Enjoy your 24 fps then on a £1700 card.I'd rather be without DLSS 3 if having it enabled brings about vsync-like mouse movement latency elastics!
And just to clarify....
Lets just agree to disagree...
That makes no sense, I'd just be using DLSS2 and benefit from the fps uplift that DLSS which we already have and something that will still be improved as time goes on, on my 3080 Ti.Enjoy your 24 fps then on a £1700 card.![]()
Is not for everyone, but I'm fine with how v-sync works in current games and if the performance is truly there... I'm in. In theory, 'cause at those prices I'm very much out!Exqueeze me! I loathe Vsyn, even though my current GPU can maintain 120+fps on a 144Hz display setting in most games, the sponge effect introduced by vsync even at these high frames is just terrible.
This is why Gsync ultimate/vrrr comes into its own.
I'd rather be without DLSS 3 if having it enabled brings about vsync-like mouse movement latency elastics!
I’m waiting to see what RDNA3 offers.3080Ti's are becoming popular I hear!![]()
Asus strix knows I want it. The psu says no, I'll have to wait for atx v3.0a full fat 4080 will be £1269 lol. And that is the FE
£949 for the crippled version
Proceeds to buy a 3080 TI.![]()
If only all the big reviewers sent their review cards back and told Nvidia where to shove it at the current prices.
My guess is most big reviewers will say how it's expensive but look at the performance not realising that price/performance has basically remained stagnate for the last 5+ years and won't even consider that your average American Jo would have to work for more than a week to be able to afford what they've been given for free.If only all the big reviewers sent their review cards back and told Nvidia where to shove it at the current prices.
/jay
Thanks nvidia for increasing the 2nd hand value of my 3090
Latency remains to be tested, but, if it is about the same as v-sync, probably a lot won't care that much if it brings up the frame rate.
To all my Turing gamer friends, It's safe to upgrade now
Not quite... the 4080 12gb is a 4060, the 4080 16gb is a 4070 and the 4090 is a 4080... the real big chip, the 4090ti will be what the 4090/titan would have been.So the 4080 12gb is essentially a 4070 but they knew they couldn't possibly try and sell a 4070 for $900 without being **** on? So by pretending it's a 4080 they think it's a-ok.
While he's not wrong he's being extremely disingenuous.During the Q&A session, Jensen Huang was asked about GPU prices. His response was very telling.
“Moore’s Law is dead. […] A 12-inch wafer is a lot more expensive today. The idea that the chip is going to go down in price is a story of the past,” said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in a response to PC World’s Gordon Ung.
Yea a 12-inch wafer is a lot more expensive today and the chips you're getting from them is more expensive but 20 series chips were estimated to cost almost a $100 more than 7-5nm so unless TSMC's 4nm chips are costing $500 and wafers now cost $32k he's trying to pull the wool over customers eyes.CSET: Calculation of foundry sale price per chip in 2020 by node
(Source)
16/12nm 10nm 7nm 5nm Mass production year and quarter 2015 Q3 2017 Q2 2018 Q3 2020 Q Capital investment per wafer processed per year $11,220 $13,169 $14,267 $16,746 Capital consumed per wafer processed in 2020 $993 $1,494 $2,330 $4,235 Other costs and markup per wafer $2,990 $4,498 $7,016 $12,753 Foundry sale price per wafer $3,984 $5,992 $9,346 $16,988 Foundry sale price per chip $331 $274 $233 $238