Soldato
No wonder they dropped prices bar the 5090, and even that should came in at 4090 price.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 5000 SERIES
- Thread starter scubes
- Start date
Poor
NVIDIA official GeForce RTX 50 vs. RTX 40 benchmarks: 15% to 33% performance uplift without DLSS Multi-Frame Generation - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA shows more RTX 50 performance figures The next-generation GPU architecture explained a bit more. NVIDIA has disclosed new performance figures for the RTX 50 series, including non-DLSS benchmarks. Unfortunately, those looking for non-ray tracing, pure raster performance data will have to...videocardz.com
Raw 5080 performance does seem underwhelming if that’s correct… :/
5090 is on track - 30% increase.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 May 2007
- Posts
- 2,044
Nvm
Last edited:
Soldato
Don't mention the supers, these could be on par or even slower.
The 4090 had the benefit of a much smaller process node, allowing vastly higher number of transistors (and thus cores, shaders etc) combined with a big bump in clock speeds.
With the 5090 only getting a marginal decrease in process size, it was never going to be able to match the 60%+ uplift of the 4090.
Associate
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2020
- Posts
- 402
Looks like 4090s will be staying above £1000 on the used market then. Very disappointing below the 5090.
Poor
NVIDIA official GeForce RTX 50 vs. RTX 40 benchmarks: 15% to 33% performance uplift without DLSS Multi-Frame Generation - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA shows more RTX 50 performance figures The next-generation GPU architecture explained a bit more. NVIDIA has disclosed new performance figures for the RTX 50 series, including non-DLSS benchmarks. Unfortunately, those looking for non-ray tracing, pure raster performance data will have to...
5070 is a DOA GPU like I predicted, 12GB and little to no improvement in rasterization over a 4070. The only improvement will be in RT games where it should perform like a 4070Ti and in AI workloads if you need that.
Soldato
If it wasn't for VR I would honestly be sticking with my 3090FE. I think a used 4090FE is my target, anyone got one coming up???
Whilst I'm not averse to frame gen and I genuinely think DLSS upscaling is great, I just don't see the appeal of DLSS 4 multi frame gen unless you have a monitor with 240Hz++ refresh. For current frame gen you need at least 50fps before frame gen as a baseline for latency to be 'ok', so as most people have 120/144hz screens at best, what is the point in x4 frame gen? x2 is all you need. Am I missing something?
Whilst I'm not averse to frame gen and I genuinely think DLSS upscaling is great, I just don't see the appeal of DLSS 4 multi frame gen unless you have a monitor with 240Hz++ refresh. For current frame gen you need at least 50fps before frame gen as a baseline for latency to be 'ok', so as most people have 120/144hz screens at best, what is the point in x4 frame gen? x2 is all you need. Am I missing something?
Last edited:
Soldato
I was disappointed the Ti will not be FE tbh.
I would argue that even the 5090 is a disaster. It's at least £2000. How is this now acceptable?
Depends on the market your looking at it from a current 40 series owner I would think
from anyone 30 series or before / new system builders it will be fine and run like a 4070ti in Raster for under £550
From someone that's currently on 30 series , I'm more interested what AMD offers in the £500 range, 12gb £500+ in 2025 yeah no
Last edited:
I'm still on a 3070Ti and I wouldn't even consider it, especially with the 9070/9070XT competing.
your right a a 5070 is not worth it from a 3080 still only a 30%