Associate
And it looks like that PSU has a single 133a rail which should be plenty.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 5000 SERIES
- Thread starter scubes
- Start date
Just a random thing I stumbled across that is 'obvious' but I've never really thought about it that way...
So in raw raster, for 100 fps 1440p you'll get 44 fps at 4k?! Dang
I've always thought about it in terms of PPI. 1440p at 16:9 tends to be around 109 PPI whereas 4K at 16:9 tends to be about 160 PPI. But that's suggests it's way less pixels in total than the true amount.
Huh!
So in raw raster, for 100 fps 1440p you'll get 44 fps at 4k?! Dang
I've always thought about it in terms of PPI. 1440p at 16:9 tends to be around 109 PPI whereas 4K at 16:9 tends to be about 160 PPI. But that's suggests it's way less pixels in total than the true amount.
Huh!
Last edited:
Future proofing for that 1200W GPU.
This is the advice to a guy looking to buy a 360W 5080.
Okay, let's waste £100.
Last edited:
Honestly, looks like someone rainbow puked onto some fans, whoever designed that needs to go lol
Well I'm skint, but on the plus side my GT1030 is hardly pushing out mega watts. Plays GameCube emulators just fine though. Love a bit of F-Zero GX on Dolphin
Associate
You're being far too polite by saying that. However, it is marginally better than the 4090 Gamerock card.
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 1,456
Interestingly, all the AIO 5090's are using 360x28mm radiators except for the Asus model - the Asus Astral LGC 5090's radiator is 360x38mm, making it thicker than all the other
Last edited:
Associate
Post got removed. It showed TBD by the clocks for me, but the OP commented this:
- Looks like its sitting at 2.58ghz vs the 5090 FEs 2.41.
- For reference, the 4090 suprim was 2.64ghz vs the FEs 2.52
Associate
Arctic showed that going thick is the way forward, with their Liquid Freezer II and III line up. Not a surprise to see someone mirror the approach on a GPU.
Imagine if you needed to upgrade your GPU to go from a 32" 4K display to a 27" 4KJust a random thing I stumbled across that is 'obvious' but I've never really thought about it that way...
So in raw raster, for 100 fps 1440p you'll get 44 fps at 4k?! Dang
I've always thought about it in terms of PPI. 1440p at 16:9 tends to be around 109 PPI whereas 4K at 16:9 tends to be about 160 PPI. But that's suggests it's way less pixels in total than the true amount.
Huh!
Last edited: