Yes, understood, thank you. For some reason my mind had always assumed the difference in ‘horsepower’ needed to push a monitor was informed by PPI… and that the gap between 1440p and 4k wasn’t so severe.
What a complete doofus
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes, understood, thank you. For some reason my mind had always assumed the difference in ‘horsepower’ needed to push a monitor was informed by PPI… and that the gap between 1440p and 4k wasn’t so severe.
As a follow up to this, I had a play around with sensible settings and it’s definitely possible to enjoy this game without having the latest and greatest card. I could hit decent fps quite comfortably with few compromises.
I think that means: don’t fomo yourself into a shiny card, it’s really not necessary to enjoy games, even those that are ‘notoriously insane to run when maxed out’.
And in many workloads i bet it is less than that.173Mhz (7%) faster than FE boost then, for extra 500 quid or so
Some of the watt numbers for parts are comedically wrong. That motherboard is never using 70W. Memory ain't using 29W. A HDD is never using 20W.
That would be true though if you compared ppi^2 on the same sized screenYes, understood, thank you. For some reason my mind had always assumed the difference in ‘horsepower’ needed to push a monitor was informed by PPI… and that the gap between 1440p and 4k wasn’t so severe.
What a complete doofus
I used to run quadfire and tri-fire for gaming not mining (although kicking myself for not mining at the time) and it will be ready for the next monster GPU.The PSU you have (EVGA 1600W G2) can only deliver it's full wattage through 9 x PCI-E 8 pin power cables. Where do you think you would ever do that outside of mining on numerous GPUs? The biggest adapters I've seen convert 4 x 8 pin (4x150W) to 16 pin (600W).
These will be a solid upgrade if coming from an older generation, I'd imagine you'll be looking at +100% bump going from a 2070S to 5070 and +150% on a 5070ti.I appreciate that with 5090/80 released on 30th, they're the most pressing cards to cover, but do we know the review embargos for the 5070/70ti yet?
The present vague Nvidia bar charts (massaged with the divisive frame generation) seems to compare the 5070ti vs the 4070ti (non Super) - so do we think the raw-power isn't much different to a 4070ti Super?
I'm presently on a 2070S and can't really justify a 5080 price, so I'm more interested in the poverty-spec offerings.
So for that to be true a) they need to be in stock and b) MSRP needs to include VAT and shippingFE are available at that price on release day
3DMark 5090 leaks
£250 per fps173Mhz (7%) faster than FE boost then, for extra 500 quid or so
Now all we need is to see games running .+50% on 4K Nomad. Nomad is non-ray traced and is supposed to represent future games. +35% on ancient Fire Strike.
3DMark 5090 leaks