• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia preparing new Geforce with GK110

LtMatt said:
Metro benchmarks are an abomination. I treat them with about as much importance as one of my turds. :p



I can only presume that my extra fps are protecting me from that stutter then. Either that or i can't see it or feel it. Do you get that stutter in game Greg with vsync off, or is it just present in the benchmark scene?

Did you try that config file i gave you for bf3?
Click to expand...

I haven't done as yet and didn't get chance to really play anything at all yesterday in honesty. Mrs had me busy all day (and it is my pub day :(). It will be done though cheers.
 
I had stutter in bf3, infact I created a thread about it a while ago. The thing that fixed it for me was to use dynamic vsync and turn off core parking.
 
LtMatt said:
You wouldn't believe the life of luxury we lead thanks to those donations mate. You'd be well jel! :cool:



Greg i ran the test and to be honest mate i don't see what you're seeing. But i guess you expected me to say that right? :p

Maybe its because i have 50% increase in average fps so it seems smoother? I didn't see any tearing either which was a surprise. Not saying its not there, but if it is i could not detect it. Whether frame pacing, which was enabled, affects the stutter or tearing ive no idea. It certainly wouldn't affect the tearing as far as i know as i still get tearing on bf3 with vsync offf and frame pacing on. Tomb Raider for me at least seems to be running tear free without vsync on the benchmark run. I studied the rocks throughout the bench run and saw nothing untoward as far as i could tell either.


Vem4Gix.jpg
Click to expand...

Just out of curiosity, I thought I would take my CPU off of stock and run my 24/7 clocks for this bench and I was still seeing the judder (without v-sync). One observation I did have though was how well my single GPU keeps up with your 7950's in this AMD gaming evolved title :p

766ede772f3241e90e6fc698188cbd5a.jpg
 
Gregster said:
Just out of curiosity, I thought I would take my CPU off of stock and run my 24/7 clocks for this bench and I was still seeing the judder (without v-sync). One observation I did have though was how well my single GPU keeps up with your 7950's in this AMD gaming evolved title :p

766ede772f3241e90e6fc698188cbd5a.jpg
Click to expand...

Lol, thems sounds like fighting words Gregy boi. You asked for it. :D

Count yourself lucky ive got crap clockers. :p

Still 21% behind though. :D :p


7bFMers.jpg
 
LtMatt said:
Lol, thems sounds like fighting words Gregy boi. You asked for it. :D

Count yourself lucky ive got crap clockers. :p

Still 21% behind though. :D :p


7bFMers.jpg
Click to expand...

This thread isn't about competing (well it really isn't) but about the GK110 being prepared by Nvidia. I have plenty in the tank but choose to bow out to keep this thread on topic :p
 
The pic looks authentic Boom but not sure on that GPU-Z validation. I can't be bothered to rip it down for verification in honest and I am sure we will hear something solid this week

@ Matt ;)
 
I'd assume Titan beater as multi core cards aren't usually used in that context.

Wouldn't suprise me if those specs are real but they do have whatever came out of the original GK112 design that might maybe finally see the light of day (512bit bus, ~15% faster clock for clock as GK110).
 
Last edited:
Gregster said:
I am probably the worst person here at math but my quick workout puts that exactly the same speed as a Titan.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the floating point throughput is virtually identical between the cards, at 4.50TF. Using those numbers the 780Ti comes out at 4.503 TF vs 4.500 for the Titan.

Of course that's using the quoted base clocks, and we all know that the cards rarely run as low as this. The boost clocks should give a better indication.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom