OcUK Cinebench R15 benchmark thread

solado · 19 Jan 2014 at 21:30

Nothing exciting - Stock speed FX-8320

8 Pack · 23 Jan 2014 at 21:36

4930k @ 6184 DDR3 2700 9-12-12-21 1T ASUS RIVE BE.

Cinebench 6 CPU world record.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2488334_8_pack_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4930k_1663_cb?recalculate=true

Jumper118 · 23 Jan 2014 at 23:16

8 Pack said:
4930k @ 6184 DDR3 2700 9-12-12-21 1T ASUS RIVE BE.

Cinebench 6 CPU world record.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2488334_8_pack_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4930k_1663_cb?recalculate=true

Not bad, thats higher than dual 1366 6cores xeons :eek:

whyscotty · 24 Jan 2014 at 12:14

[email protected]

FlanK3r · 26 Jan 2014 at 09:34

Jumper118 said:
did you just buy all the cpu's? wtf

anyway here is my new and improved score. got over 700 now

More CPUs than in RIG. Rig is too short

. I have 3 desktop PCs, one benchtable PC and one notebook. And few motherboards (maybe 10), around 30 CPUs, some DRAM kits, 3 PSUs only for extreme OC (750-1200W). Never sell it - too much love

8 Pack said:
4930k @ 6184 DDR3 2700 9-12-12-21 1T ASUS RIVE BE.

Cinebench 6 CPU world record.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2488334_8_pack_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4930k_1663_cb?recalculate=true

awesome, so desktop CPU WR :-)

humbug · 2 Mar 2014 at 00:25

I can't believe i have just destroyed a 4.6Ghz AMD FX-6 core with a 4 year old 4.2Ghz AMD 6 core.

621.Core i5 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - Frozennonva
604.Core i7 [email protected] 4cores/8 threads - humbug
552.[email protected] 3modules/6 threads- Jonnyp1993
511.Core i5 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - the1gooner
494.[email protected] 3modules/6 threads- Jumper118
474.[email protected] 4cores/8 threads - MeEsH BaKkA
471.Core 2 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - MeEsH BaKKA
441.Core 2 Quad9650@4Ghz 4cores/4 threads - WingZero30
439.Xeon E3 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - CAT-THE-FIFTH
390.Phenom II X4 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - Kei
334.A10 [email protected] 2modules/4 threads - stulid
301.Core i3 [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Wazza
180.Core 2 Duo [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Th0nt
96.Core 2 [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Stulid

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25504738&postcount=297

OLDPHART · 2 Mar 2014 at 11:52

Another run 4820K:4.6GHz SLI 670:Stock:915/Memory:1502/Boost:980 > OC'd:1113/Memory:1749/Booost:1178.

Martini1991 · 2 Mar 2014 at 11:57

humbug said:
I can't believe i have just destroyed a 4.6Ghz AMD FX-6 core with a 4 year old 4.2Ghz AMD 6 core.

621.Core i5 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - Frozennonva
604.Core i7 [email protected] 4cores/8 threads - humbug
552.[email protected] 3modules/6 threads- Jonnyp1993
511.Core i5 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - the1gooner
494.[email protected] 3modules/6 threads- Jumper118
474.[email protected] 4cores/8 threads - MeEsH BaKkA
471.Core 2 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - MeEsH BaKKA
441.Core 2 Quad9650@4Ghz 4cores/4 threads - WingZero30
439.Xeon E3 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - CAT-THE-FIFTH
390.Phenom II X4 [email protected] 4cores/4 threads - Kei
334.A10 [email protected] 2modules/4 threads - stulid
301.Core i3 [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Wazza
180.Core 2 Duo [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Th0nt
96.Core 2 [email protected] 2cores/2 threads - Stulid

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25504738&postcount=297

FPU performance, I've alluded to the fact a Thuban's capable of doing so, just never see many thubans anymore

I wonder what my Thuban could have done, could Cinebench at 4.5GHZ.

Jamin280672 · 2 Mar 2014 at 12:00

Not sure if ive done this right, let me know and correct me for a re-run if required. 1st picture is 4 cores 8 threads, and the 2nd picture is 1 thread.

humbug · 2 Mar 2014 at 14:11

Its right ^^^^

Martini1991 said:
FPU performance, I've alluded to the fact a Thuban's capable of doing so, just never see many thubans anymore

I wonder what my Thuban could have done, could Cinebench at 4.5GHZ.

I'm still playing with it, I have the CPU-NB @ 2600Mhz, its adding about 5%, but the IMC is not so stable in this one, volts for the IMC are at 1.325v, which seems a bit high already.

The CPU is at 1.42v with very high LLC, i have tried it at 4.3Ghz @ 1.44v, its gets near the end and Cinebench errors out.

Temperatures are good, 48c at the cores on IBT, but Current Compatibility is already at 130%, it will go higher. but i think thats already high.

Kei · 2 Mar 2014 at 15:08

You aren't even pushing that chip particularly hard. I had to push 1.55 volts through my deneb to get 4GHz sufficiently stable that it could run cinebench/super pi. Same for the IMC to run it at 2.9GHz. I ran that chip at 1.45V/1.35V for nearly 5 years solid and suffered no deterioration. (though i was running an older 790FX board which had no LLC/over-current settings.) Always ran warm though, even under water it still hit low 50's. Pre water it ran at a consistent 60-62 under a megahalems.

humbug · 2 Mar 2014 at 15:58

Kei said:
You aren't even pushing that chip particularly hard. I had to push 1.55 volts through my deneb to get 4GHz sufficiently stable that it could run cinebench/super pi. Same for the IMC to run it at 2.9GHz. I ran that chip at 1.45V/1.35V for nearly 5 years solid and suffered no deterioration. (though i was running an older 790FX board which had no LLC/over-current settings.) Always ran warm though, even under water it still hit low 50's. Pre water it ran at a consistent 60-62 under a megahalems.

I'm going to try higher volts later on.

If I can get it to score 650 I will be happy.

OLDPHART · 2 Mar 2014 at 17:11

humbug said:
I'm going to try higher volts later on.

If I can get it to score 650 I will be happy.

A man after my own heart or no brains, when seeing how my new build with a 4820k CPU:4.7GHz 1.4v it took 1.5v to get to 4.8GHz. I just clenched me buttocks and connected the house to 3 phase on the National Grid and pressed button B.

iTek · 8 Mar 2014 at 10:15

Update from me. Changed me board and did a little better.

1202 @ 4.7Ghz 3930K

McstylisT · 9 Mar 2014 at 21:28

Made small progress 4.3ghz on my 4670K mini Itx system. improved score

657 multi - 169 single

zoomee · 10 Mar 2014 at 15:16

iTek said:
Update from me. Changed me board and did a little better.

1202 @ 4.7Ghz 3930K

SNAP!

[email protected]/16gb 1866 Cas9 - 24/7 stable

zoomee · 10 Mar 2014 at 15:40

re-ran single core after reboot - still not sure its what it should be - multi is only at x37 so scored 162 -

Nickolp1974 · 10 Mar 2014 at 16:01

Does this thread get updated?????

will do for now

FlanK3r · 10 Mar 2014 at 20:03

Martini1991 said:
FPU performance, I've alluded to the fact a Thuban's capable of doing so, just never see many thubans anymore

I wonder what my Thuban could have done, could Cinebench at 4.5GHZ.

No, I have the gold one and max Cinebench is 4260 MHz with 1.56V, CPU is very hot, cooling Xigmatek Dark Knight+3000RPM Ultra Kaze...

Hm, the problem is not exactly FPU performance, but 3 units for 6 cores, so FP is overloading in Cinebench

Martini1991 · 10 Mar 2014 at 20:12

The only screenshot I have of my Thuban is a 4.375GHZ of IBT, it could Cinebench at 4.5GHZ (You'll have to take my word on this, it simply was an absolute Golden chip). I had mine under a 120.3 RAD.

That was far from the best the chip was capable of too.

Given launch day you could bench 1090T's at 4.2GHZ, a "Gold" 4260MHZ Cinebench run doesn't sound all that gold

And those 3 units on the 6 cores are the reason for the FPU performance, as Cinebench is an FPU benchmark, (So if you ran an FX4300 in Cinebench, then compared to an FX8320 running 1 core per module, the results should be higher on the FX83)