This has probably been discussed before, but a search turned up many results, cluttered with wiki page links but nothing specific to an OcUK wiki.
So why haven’t we got one? There are some benefits as far as the forum is concerned, it may take away a chunk of bandwidth requirements from external traffic and reduce the load and therefore cost on servers (although perhaps it would take a separate server? I’m not well versed on the actual setup of community wikis). It would also offer a more functional and continually up to date knowledge-base than the stickies can provide.
The only problems I can see is the possibility of sabotage (easily rectified by having a closed submission structure, whereby only forum members can create an account and submit/edit articles, but the vetting of account creation would have to be manual? [Also note that the entire wiki structure is built upon the fact you can go back to previous revisions and see what any user has edited]) and the added man-hours used to moderate? Wiki pages, from large communities are normally very good at self-moderation as the majority of the user base wants to keep it as accurate and succinct as possible. So I can only see one or two moderators having to be appointed to deal with it as at most moderation will probably only be 4-5 man-hours worth a day on a very very large wiki community?
This might be an awful idea for a reason I’m not seeing but I thought it was worth a mention.
So why haven’t we got one? There are some benefits as far as the forum is concerned, it may take away a chunk of bandwidth requirements from external traffic and reduce the load and therefore cost on servers (although perhaps it would take a separate server? I’m not well versed on the actual setup of community wikis). It would also offer a more functional and continually up to date knowledge-base than the stickies can provide.
The only problems I can see is the possibility of sabotage (easily rectified by having a closed submission structure, whereby only forum members can create an account and submit/edit articles, but the vetting of account creation would have to be manual? [Also note that the entire wiki structure is built upon the fact you can go back to previous revisions and see what any user has edited]) and the added man-hours used to moderate? Wiki pages, from large communities are normally very good at self-moderation as the majority of the user base wants to keep it as accurate and succinct as possible. So I can only see one or two moderators having to be appointed to deal with it as at most moderation will probably only be 4-5 man-hours worth a day on a very very large wiki community?
This might be an awful idea for a reason I’m not seeing but I thought it was worth a mention.
Last edited: