Ocuks team number?

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:33

Whats ocuks team number for folding at home?

Zip · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:47

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:48

Thanks.

Zip · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:48

Energize said:
Thanks.

No problem

Its in the sticky aswell if you forget again

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:50

How long should my cpu take to complete 1 frame?

Mattus · 13 Jul 2006 at 02:56

Energize said:
How long should my cpu take to complete 1 frame?

This depends on the project number of the WU. It could range from 2 minutes to an hour, depending on the WU's size. What's the project number given in your log?

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 03:13

Project: 1808

diogenese · 13 Jul 2006 at 07:34

If you get a copy of FahMon, you can get benchmarks like this for yourself

Project : 1808
Core : Amber
Frames : 100
Credit : 153

-- BLUE --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 17s - 179.36 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 12mn 27s - 176.96 ppd

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 08:34

Atm it says 2m :12s/frame.

I get all that benchmark info in the ui.

Mikey1280 · 13 Jul 2006 at 08:40

Energize said:
Atm it says 2m :12s/frame.

I get all that benchmark info in the ui.

Are you using the GUI version?

VeNT · 13 Jul 2006 at 10:42

what are you THINKING BOY!, theres NO HOPE for the GUI, use the command line one! 1000000x better!

oceaness · 13 Jul 2006 at 11:34

See the sticky if you want to change to the command line version. It's a lot less hassle using it as it starts as a background service with windows.

rich99million · 13 Jul 2006 at 14:25

there's nothing THAT wrong with the GUI - the cores do all the actual work so it's the same speed anyway

however the GUI does have a few issues (namely unreliable ETAs on many work units, a tendancy to minimise games, the fact it will stop running if you log off) which do make the console a better choice for a lot of people

The GUI is good for beginners though - so you can see what's actually going on

welcome to the team by the way :cool:

VeNT · 13 Jul 2006 at 15:25

rich99million said:
there's nothing THAT wrong with the GUI - the cores do all the actual work so it's the same speed anyway

however the GUI does have a few issues (namely unreliable ETAs on many work units, a tendancy to minimise games, the fact it will stop running if you log off) which do make the console a better choice for a lot of people

The GUI is good for beginners though - so you can see what's actually going on

welcome to the team by the way

I'll draw you the learning curve for folding,

it goes like this................................................_______________________
...................................................................|
...................................................................|
...................................................................|
...................................................................|
...................................................................|
__________________________________________|
gui my arse

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 18:36

I wouldn't be suprised if the performance improvement was 0.1%.

Mattus · 13 Jul 2006 at 18:46

If you have the GUI minimised there's no performance deficit at all. But the other advantages of the console (less memory used, doesn't crash) make it worth it IMO.

Energize · 13 Jul 2006 at 18:56

If thats it I'll stick with the gui it only uses 4MB of memory anyway.