• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

setter said:
Yep, ill maybe give the modded drivers a whirl, btw, good score Greebo, i think im currently on the limit with the cards cores/shaders, raising the memory speed from stock (1674 - 1700) gave me a little boost, cpu running at 4050, (21 x 193).
Click to expand...

Yeah but you loose almost 2000 points by the combined not working properly. In the graphics tests, you#re not far behind me and in one you beat me. ;)
 
Spec as per sig
It would appear the trusty Q6600 is struggling somewhat:)

3dmark11a.jpg
 
core i7 950 @ 4.2 and GTX 480 SLI @ 875/2050


3DMark Score P11431

Graphics score 12251

Physics Score 10100

Combined Score 8767

GraphicsTest1 52.75 FPS

GraphicsTest2 56.19 FPS

GraphicsTest3 77.35 FPS

GraphicsTest4 39.35 FPS

PhysicsTest 32.06 FPS

CombinedTest 40.78 FPS
 
Last edited:
RavenXXX2 said:
Some nice overclocks going on here, good to see.
Click to expand...

+1 Yes on both ATI + NVidea whether the CPU is AMD or Intel, my 470 has hit the brick wall > 890/1780/2130 1087mv. I might be able to squeeze a tad more but its not worth it, it will not do 900/1800/1674 1087mv.

Good job Locky cracked the 10k in good style > 11431, a good job to all. :D
 
Cracking score Locky. Those gtx480 are really pulling ahead of my gtx470 in 3dmark11.

I wonder why my physics score is so low compared to yours though? Might have to look into that.
 
Greebo said:
Cracking score Locky. Those gtx480 are really pulling ahead of my gtx470 in 3dmark11.

I wonder why my physics score is so low compared to yours though? Might have to look into that.
Click to expand...

Because he has about
30Gb/s more memory bandwidth.
16 more ROP's
64 more Shader Cores.
 
Even at 4.2ghz, I run the ram uber tight, 2000mhz @ 16,7,7,7 1T

My physics score is 10100, yours is 9160, there isn't much in it and various tweaks would pull it closer,

Unless the GPU makes any different to the physics score I don't know.

I would love to try this system on a highly overclocked 980x :D
 
895 core 2050 mem

P6531 3DMarks


Graphics score
6225

Physics Score
9359

Combined Score
6028

GraphicsTest1
26.91 FPS

GraphicsTest2
28.43 FPS

GraphicsTest3
39.23 FPS

GraphicsTest4
20.02 FPS

PhysicsTest
29.71 FPS

CombinedTest
28.04 FPS
 
Locky said:
Even at 4.2ghz, I run the ram uber tight, 2000mhz @ 16,7,7,7 1T

My physics score is 10100, yours is 9160, there isn't much in it and various tweaks would pull it closer,

Unless the GPU makes any different to the physics score I don't know.

I would love to try this system on a highly overclocked 980x :D
Click to expand...

Pretty sure physics is cpu only. But I have noticed the cpu makes quite a difference to all the other gpu scores so I will be losing marks there as well.

Said to say I only have my memory running at 1600mhz @ 20,8,8,8,1T :o
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom