• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

GPU clcoked to: 930/1440

3DMark ScoreP5517

Graphics score5288

Physics Score7337

Combined Score5268

GraphicsTest122.54 FPS

GraphicsTest227.43 FPS

GraphicsTest333.06 FPS

GraphicsTest415.9 FPS

PhysicsTest23.29 FPS
CombinedTest24.5 FPS
 
3DMark Score: P4746

Graphics score: 5403

Physics Score: 3556

Combined Score: 3369

GraphicsTest1: 23.73 FPS

GraphicsTest2: 28.19 FPS

GraphicsTest3: 34.14 FPS

GraphicsTest4: 15.79 FPS

PhysicsTest: 11.29 FPS

CombinedTest: 15.67 FPS

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/361714;jses...m11/361714?key=vUmVJAzFzyh3fnYMY4YswaNtuftWDW

6950 @ 950/1400

My i3 sorely lets me down in comparison to i5 quads and i7s and Phenom II 6 cores* (edit*) but at least my graphic score is semi decent.
 
Last edited:
I ran this bench on the 17th December 2010 (seems ages ago) and this is what I scored on my normal setup back then.

P5,380 3DMarks (Advanced Edition)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/202857

CPU: [email protected] (1067MHz FSB)
GPU: 5970 2GB @790MHz/1050MHz DDR5 ~modest for 24/7 use

Detailed scores
3DMark Score - P5380
Graphics score - 7015
Physics Score - 3400
Combined Score - 2871
GraphicsTest1 - 36.62 FPS
GraphicsTest2 - 37.03 FPS
GraphicsTest3 - 43.17 FPS
GraphicsTest4 - 18.64 FPS
PhysicsTest - 10.79 FPS
CombinedTest - 13.36 FPS
 
Last edited:
System as follows:

Mobo: ASUS Rampage II Extreme (BIOS ver 1704)
CPU: Intel Core i7 920 (O/clocked ~4GHz)
CPU Cooler: Corsair H50
RAM: 6Gb (3 x 2Gb) Corsair TwinX Dominator GT DDR3 @ 1600MHz
HD 0: 2 x Corsair F120 SSD in RAID 0
HD 1: 300Gb Western Digital VelociRaptor
PSU: 850W CoolerMaster SilentPro
GPU: 2 x GTX 580 (Core clock 797 MHz, Memory clock 2025 MHz)
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster P2250 (1920 x 1080) 60 MHz refresh
OS: Windows 7 Professional x64

I ran the 1st test with HyperThreading enabled:

3DMark Score P6122
Graphics score 5994
Physics Score 8831
Combined Score 4715
GraphicsTest 125.86 FPS
GraphicsTest 227.22 FPS
GraphicsTest 338.0 FPS
GraphicsTest 419.33 FPS
PhysicsTest 28.04 FPS
CombinedTest 21.93 FPS

And, because it's recommended to run ArmA2 with HT disabled when there is a lot of AI on a map, I ran a 2nd test with HT disabled:

3DMark Score P6034
Graphics score 5995
Physics Score 7701
Combined Score 4732
GraphicsTest 125.84 FPS
GraphicsTest 227.23 FPS
GraphicsTest 338.06 FPS
GraphicsTest 419.32 FPS
PhysicsTest 24.45 FPS
CombinedTest 22.01 FPS
 
Sayso said:
nice beating a I7@4ghz at stock, Sandybridge is looking good.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and if he overclocks to about 4.7Ghz he should hit just over 11k on the physics test going from the stock 3.4Ghz score. :D

I should be building a new rig about April so I'm looking forward to trying SandyBridge.
 
J.D said:
Yeah, and if he overclocks to about 4.7Ghz he should hit just over 11k on the physics test going from the stock 3.4Ghz score. :D

I should be building a new rig about April so I'm looking forward to trying SandyBridge.
Click to expand...

I bet your i3 at 4.2Ghz and 6950 is better for gaming than a i5 2600K and 6870.

Video encoding though a different matter.
 
the1gooner said:
I bet your i3 at 4.2Ghz and 6950 is better for gaming than a i5 2600K and 6870.

Video encoding though a different matter.
Click to expand...

Don't want to get picky but the new Sandy Bridge 2600K is a i7, the 2500K is a i5.

Very impressive results with the 2600K - I'm treating myself with one very soon :) Just a shame your only running one 6870 to really see how far it will go before the GPU hits the ceiling. Would be interesting to see how well the 2600K and 580GTX SLi would do. Even that may struggle to break the 10K mark.
 
both ati 6950 unlocked to 6970. both cores running 900 @ the moment.
both on air. u got to love the scores in crossfire they scale very good.
got both cards for £440.00. with these scores nothing comes close in that price range.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/370078


3dmark 11 score 9872.

3DMark Score
P9872
Graphics score
10400
Physics Score
9341
Combined Score
7623
GraphicsTest1
44.35 FPS
GraphicsTest2
53.76 FPS
GraphicsTest3
65.4 FPS
GraphicsTest4
31.24 FPS
PhysicsTest
29.66 FPS
CombinedTest
35.46 FPS
 
Last edited:
Dazboots said:
got both cards for £440.00. with these scores nothing comes close in that price range.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/370078


3dmark 11 score 9872.

3DMark Score
P9872
Graphics score
10400
Physics Score
9341
Combined Score
7623
GraphicsTest1
44.35 FPS
GraphicsTest2
53.76 FPS
GraphicsTest3
65.4 FPS
GraphicsTest4
31.24 FPS
PhysicsTest
29.66 FPS
CombinedTest
35.46 FPS
Click to expand...

Except my £310 gtx470's ;)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/70808

3DMark ScoreP9344
Graphics score9716
Physics Score 9160
Combined Score 7435
GraphicsTest1 42.08 FPS
GraphicsTest2 44.55 FPS
GraphicsTest3 61.6 FPS
GraphicsTest4 31.02 FPS
PhysicsTest 29.08 FPS
CombinedTest 34.58 FPS

Only jesting the 6950 are the new bang for buck cards.
 
Dazboots said:
give it a run without physics. see the score then.
Click to expand...

:confused: 3dmark uses only the cpu for physics not the physx on the Nvidia cards. Same score with physx switched off. :p

And my cpu was only running at 4.2 Ghz with the gtx470's at 780Mhz in that test I think. Might do a 840 core, 4.5Ghz cpu run tonight with the new drivers which add 600 points apparantly and finally crack the 10k barrier. ;)

Just found my 839 core, 4.2Ghz results ;)

3DMark Score P9698
Graphics score 10167
Physics Score 9217
Combined Score 7653
GraphicsTest1 43.87 FPS
GraphicsTest2 46.83 FPS
GraphicsTest3 63.61 FPS
GraphicsTest4 32.67 FPS
PhysicsTest 29.26 FPS
CombinedTest 35.6 FPS
 
Last edited:
Greebo said:
:confused: 3dmark uses only the cpu for physics not the physx on the Nvidia cards. Same score with physx switched off. :p

And my cpu was only running at 4Ghz with the gtx470's at 780Mhz in that test I think. Might do a 840 core, 4.5Ghz cpu run tonight with the new drivers which add 600 points apparantly and finally crack the 10k barrier. ;)
Click to expand...
What drivers were you running for that test Greebo, with my cpu at 4ghz and the gu's at 800/1600/1700 im scoring just over 8000.
 
setter said:
What drivers were you running for that test Greebo, with my cpu at 4ghz and the gu's at 800/1600/1700 im scoring just over 8000.
Click to expand...

Just ones from last month but I have done the tweak to get SLI working properly in the combined test. I'll check tonight when home.

EDIT: 3dmark says 8.17.12.6590

Here's my result with SLI broken: 7615 so yours seems about right if you haven't done the SLI tweak.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/97056

3DMark Score P7615
Graphics score 9726
Physics Score 9187
Combined Score 2641
GraphicsTest1 42.04 FPS
GraphicsTest2 44.46 FPS
GraphicsTest3 61.66 FPS
GraphicsTest4 31.17 FPS
PhysicsTest 29.17 FPS
CombinedTest 12.29 FPS
 
Last edited:
Im using the 266.35 beta's, ran 3dm just now, 5118, sli definitely not working, as on my logitech g15 lcd display, only one card was showing 90% plus usage. Whats this sli fix Greebo?

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/371914

Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
# of cards
2
SLI / CrossFire
On
Memory
1280 MB
Core clock
800 MHz
Memory clock
1702 MHz
Driver name
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Driver version
8.17.12.6635
Driver status
Not FM Approved
General
Operating system
64-bit Windows 7 (6.1.7600)
Motherboard
ASUSTeK Computer INC. P6T DELUXE V2
Hard drive model
Memory
6144 MB
Module 1
2048 MB OCZ 9 @ 533 MHz
Module 2
2048 MB OCZ 9 @ 533 MHz
Module 3
2048 MB OCZ 9 @ 533 MHz
Detailed scores
3DMark Score
P5118
Graphics score
4913
Physics Score
9032
Combined Score
3829
GraphicsTest1
21.45 FPS
GraphicsTest2
22.51 FPS
GraphicsTest3
29.8 FPS
GraphicsTest4
15.96 FPS
PhysicsTest
28.67 FPS
CombinedTest
17.81 FPS

Though in the results section it states that sli is on, but then it also states that my ram is only running at 533mhz, actually at 771mhz ddr.:confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom