****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

[OC2000]

Updated score..

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/6419/3930k50ghz3dmark11singl.jpg
By oc2000 at 2012-07-06

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3825928

OC2000 ---- 3930K @ 5.0Ghz ---- (1) 680 ---- 1336/3523/2672 ---- 132%/+135/+425 --- P11642---- Air

 

[the_worrier]

P5654

as per sig.

 

[piggin]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3836736

Using the basic version

 

[Tonester0011]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3527114

Pretty poor score looking through this thread, oh well =(

 

[Kaapstad]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3527114

Pretty poor score looking through this thread, oh well =(

For a single card its a good score and would beat some good cards. What clocks are you using.

 

[F1aw1ess]

Kaapstad, how come you havent done a run in the heaven bencharking thread here, that is one beast of a machine you got there!

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18386056

 

[Kaapstad]

Kaapstad, how come you havent done a run in the heaven bencharking thread here, that is one beast of a machine you got there!

I have done plenty of runs but nothing of note. In that benchmark 4x sli is no match for 3 HD 7970s. If the settings are maxed out on everything @ 2560x1600 then I start getting a look in.

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1379/00000mq.jpg

The above was done at the settings used for the benchmark

http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/7137/00007s.jpg

This one was done at extreme settings where my setup is more competative with the HD 7970s

 

[Tonester0011]

For a single card its a good score and would beat some good cards. What clocks are you using.

1200/1575

 

[F1aw1ess]

I have done plenty of runs but nothing of note. In that benchmark 4x sli is no match for 3 HD 7970s. If the settings are maxed out on everything @ 2560x1600 then I start getting a look in.

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1379/00000mq.jpg

The above was done at the settings used for the benchmark

http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/7137/00007s.jpg

This one was done at extreme settings where my setup is more competative with the HD 7970s

ah okay that surprises me

 

[Kaapstad]

ah okay that surprises me

Its not all bad news I get even with this benchmark

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3656899

 

[OC2000]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3836736

Using the basic version

I am interested to know how you are able to get the physics score so high? At 5.1Ghz I am getting a physics score of 16100

Cheers

 

[Kaapstad]

I am interested to know how you are able to get the physics score so high? At 5.1Ghz I am getting a physics score of 16100

Cheers

It may be down to memory speed and timings

 

[OC2000]

It may be down to memory speed and timings

Think you are right. Just lowered my ram from 2133 to 1866 to check and the score dropped by 600 points.

 

[piggin]

I am interested to know how you are able to get the physics score so high? At 5.1Ghz I am getting a physics score of 16100

Cheers

CPU 5125Mhz
RAM 2333 Mhz 9-11-10-28
GPU (1) +185 / +540 slot 1 @ 16x
GPU (2) +130 / +480 slot 1 @ 8x
GPU (3) +170 / +550 slot 1 @ 16x

 

[OC2000]

Seems the higher ram does make quite a bit of difference.

Ordered some Trident X Ram 2666, and will attempt to clock it to 2400 with tighter timings

 

[Kaapstad]

Seems the higher ram does make quite a bit of difference.

Ordered some Trident X Ram 2666, and will attempt to clock it to 2400 with tighter timings

+1

I am waiting for the latest corsair memory to hit the shelves and do much the same.

 

[OC2000]

Those look good, pity they're not out yet.

 

[Tonester0011]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3937710

2 7970's both 1125/1575.
Ones under water the others on air.