***** Official 3D Mark Vantage Scores thread *****

[wuyanxu]

oh yeah!
broke 7k mark
fastest 8800GTX on this forum

 

[gary996]

Have a new one here slight OC on the proc

 

[gary996]

Ignore sorry

 

[Shaddow]

http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=34859&resultType=19

Score : 5884
CPU:12633
GPU:4995

 

[marc2003]

...

 

[wuyanxu]

marc, my picture is a PNG, do you need me to convert it?

damn! was about to say im the fastest GTX...... need to get myself a q9xxx

 

[marc2003]

...

 

[thegoonden]

Bout time I submitted.
What's the best way to capture a jpg from a single window without all that mucking about with mspants.

 

[Wizardskills]

Bout time I submitted.
What's the best way to capture a jpg from a single window without all that mucking about with mspants.

Alt + Print Screen

 

[Bonjour]

3701

Really need to upgrade that Opty..

 

[Orcish-Horde]

P4165 3DMarks
http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=69045&resultType=19

I don't think I will ever run this test again, imo its pure pants.

 

[marc2003]

...

 

[Neal]

4440

e2160 @ 2997 - 8800gt @ stock 660/1650/1800 (i notice the cpu recognition is still wrong as it puts me in as an E4300)

 

[StevenG]

could you please update the list... ive put my score on there

StevenG

EDIT: shouldnt there be a propper thread with the list at the start like the other threads that has been done?

 

[chaparral]

EDIT: shouldnt there be a propper thread with the list at the start like the other threads that has been done?

I agree......

We need marc2003 to start his own Official 3D Mark Vantage Scores thread

 

[marc2003]

ok done.

 

[Vertigo]

While you're at it, make it graphics scores only seeing as the CPU weighting is totally unrealistic.

Really don't know why people persist with this garbage piece of software. A proper benchmark should accurately reflect performance of the average game and be totally independent from all influence by the hardware manufacturers and OS vendor. 3DMark fails on all counts.

Seriously though, why not maintain two lists, one of overall scores and one of graphics scores. In addition to the graphics one being more useful, it'll demonstrate how skewed the overall one is.

 

[wuyanxu]

While you're at it, make it graphics scores only seeing as the CPU weighting is totally unrealistic.

Really don't know why people persist with this garbage piece of software. A proper benchmark should accurately reflect performance of the average game and be totally independent from all influence by the hardware manufacturers and OS vendor. 3DMark fails on all counts.

Seriously though, why not maintain two lists, one of overall scores and one of graphics scores. In addition to the graphics one being more useful, it'll demonstrate how skewed the overall one is.

totally agree on the 2 list request

but in terms of usefulness of this Vantage software, i would have to say it is very useful. this is actually the first Dx10 exclusive test available, and it shows clearly which architecture is the king in Dx10.
show me any game and that is exclusively Dx10, that upon benchmarked, show very similar scores all the time.

 

[gurusan]

Crysis in Very High mode?

 

[marc2003]

ok i'm working on the 2 lists idea.

edit: done.