-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** Official SuperPI Leaderboard ***
- Thread starter illuz
- Start date
7.22 territory 
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 5,253
- Location
- London
tl;dr, has there been a quicker 2600k than mine?
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 11,629
- Location
- Northampton
Need more benches on XP these Haswell times should be ruining my 3570k time
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
My results running my 24/7 oc.
Resize the image to no more than 1280x wide or use spoiler tags like I have done for you - stulid.
Resize the image to no more than 1280x wide or use spoiler tags like I have done for you - stulid.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
Bugger, sorry stulid, completely forgot pal, won't happen again.
Well after complaining lately about my move to Kingston beast ram, I seem to be bettering all my benchmarks with it installed. Guess they were worth the hassle after all.
[email protected] , beast 2400mhz 10-11-10-27 1T
[email protected] , beast 2400mhz 10-11-10-27 1T
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
New update from me.
Not really fancy pushing the core anymore untill it's all underwater, but can anyone tell me if playing with the secondary/third timings help get the time lower?
Not really fancy pushing the core anymore untill it's all underwater, but can anyone tell me if playing with the secondary/third timings help get the time lower?
New update from me.
Not really fancy pushing the core anymore untill it's all underwater, but can anyone tell me if playing with the secondary/third timings help get the time lower?
should do,the trfc can be lower,maybe 120 then 96 then 88 whatever you can get stable
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
Cheers Wazza, i'll have a little play about with it when i get chance.
Welcome to the club mate.
Strangely the last score i entered was with my ram on its XMP setting, (2400, 10-11-11-31, 2T). On previous attempts on theese settings i could never break 7min. Nor with the ram at 2600mhz, 11-13-12-31, 1T. Iirc it scored the same 7m.04 as the xmp setting.
Strangely the last score i entered was with my ram on its XMP setting, (2400, 10-11-11-31, 2T). On previous attempts on theese settings i could never break 7min. Nor with the ram at 2600mhz, 11-13-12-31, 1T. Iirc it scored the same 7m.04 as the xmp setting.
Welcome to the club mate.
Strangely the last score i entered was with my ram on its XMP setting, (2400, 10-11-11-31, 2T). On previous attempts on theese settings i could never break 7min. Nor with the ram at 2600mhz, 11-13-12-31, 1T. Iirc it scored the same 7m.04 as the xmp setting.
Thanks setter
I think the ram plays a big part here. This new MSI board has some excellent features, especially for the ram. You can use the "try it" option and set a C9/10/11 performance/compatibility setting, the interesting thing is it apply's changes to the sub settings also, tightening them right up which is key in this prog. Though the extra 200mhz might of helped too.
Last edited: