*** Official Ubiquiti Discussion Thread ***

The first attempt at using a custom certificate for local access hasn't gone so well, created the PEM and uploaded it with no issues. When activating it, it's still unifi.local which I thought was odd so gave it a reboot and then the Networking service got stuck in a loop.

As its now under the location:

Control Plane > Console > Certificates > Add New

Long story short, I had to reset the UDM-PM. I'll do a bit more reading a try again over the weekend and see if I just got impatient
 
Last edited:
RSR said:
The first attempt at using a custom certificate for local access hasn't gone so well, created the PEM and uploaded it with no issues. When activating it, it's still unifi.local which I thought was odd so gave it a reboot and then the Networking service got stuck in a loop.

As its now under the location:

Control Plane > Console > Certificates > Add New

Long story short, I had to reset the UDM-PM. I'll do a bit more reading a try again over the weekend and see if I just got impatient
Click to expand...
You just want a signed cert on it? Why not use GlennR’s scripts?
 
I'm using a UDR and recently upgraded to a 910 fibre package, with IPS disabled the speed test when run through the UDRs console page gets up to the full 910Mbps.

However I've run speedtests from devices plugged directly into one of the UDR switch ports, from a flex mini 2.5G that's connected, and also from a U6-IW switch port, and all cap out at around 500 meg.

File transfers from a device connected directly to the UDR and something hanging off the flex mini 2.5 run at full gig speed so can rule out cabling etc.

What am I missing here that could be causing devices to not seemingly get the full speed of the connection, other than maybe the UDR just not being able to handle it in practice, regardless of what the inbuilt speed test says?

Any good/better ways to test other than just going to the usual speedtest websites? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
ChrisD. said:
Smart queues enabled?
Click to expand...
No made sure that was off, same as flow control.

Think it’s probably just a UDR lack of power thing, but would’ve thought if it speed tests itself at 900meg it’d be able to provide that to a connected client.

Not end of the world, eventually I’d like to upgrade to one of the newer cloud gateway Max devices, but then also need a new access point, PoE switch, and at the moment not sure where I’d put it
 
Last edited:
ChrisD. said:
I have a single U6 Enterprise which covers our 4 bed newish house. I get anywhere from 400 Mbps to 1130 Mbps (my ISP speed) depending on where in the house I am. I also have a UAP FlexHD which is installed on the soffit to cover the garage and garden, which some 2.4 GHz devices seem to prefer connecting to. That gives me around 4-500 Mbps outside and allows me to 'work' from my garage while I'm actually doing DIY/man jobs.
Click to expand...
Sorry for the bump, but how are you getting on with this @ChrisD.? I was considering one of these to replace my venerable Ruckus R710 (which pushes 500Mbps over AC 5GHz all day long). My MacBook, iPhone and most other devices in the house are WiFi 6 or above now (some AX, some AXE) so it makes sense to upgrade it alongside the router as we move beyond gigabit WAN. I also considered the Zyzel NWA220AX-6E which is well reviewed and much cheaper, but it only allows 6GHz *or* 5GHz, not both, so no good for more legacy clients.
 
Last edited:
Ev0 said:
No made sure that was off, same as flow control.

Think it’s probably just a UDR lack of power thing, but would’ve thought if it speed tests itself at 900meg it’d be able to provide that to a connected client.

Not end of the world, eventually I’d like to upgrade to one of the newer cloud gateway Max devices, but then also need a new access point, PoE switch, and at the moment not sure where I’d put it
Click to expand...
Is the UDR the cylindrical Dream Machine thing? If so when I was looking up which router to get a lot of people said it struggled with full gigabit internet. That's why I got the SE.
 
Ev0 said:
No made sure that was off, same as flow control.

Think it’s probably just a UDR lack of power thing, but would’ve thought if it speed tests itself at 900meg it’d be able to provide that to a connected client.

Not end of the world, eventually I’d like to upgrade to one of the newer cloud gateway Max devices, but then also need a new access point, PoE switch, and at the moment not sure where I’d put it
Click to expand...

UI support has said in the past that UDR would max out around 600-700Mbps on WAN depending a bit on your setup, so this would sound consistent. Hardware limitations for routing. UDM-Pro or better would be recommended I think, not sure about some of the newer gateways though which may chew through that just fine. Check some reviews as they usually test throughput with and without the security features enabled.
 
Yeah I know it’s not got the power for full gigabit, but at the moment devices aren’t even pulling up to the rated speed.

Plus the rated speed of 700Mbps is with IDS on, turning that off gives a bump.

It’s not an issue as such, I’m not missing that bandwidth for anything, but would’ve been nice to get the rated values at least :)

Shame they don’t really do a good all in one device anymore as for some they fit the bill nicely.
 
robj20 said:
I'm after a new 12U cabinet.
Do you think a 450mm deep is enough (315mm usable) or best with a 550mm (410mm usable)?
Click to expand...

I would definitely go with 550mm if you can fit it.

I bought a 22U 600mm cabinet thinking that was way deeper than required, but after keeping some service loop spare network cables around the rear and routing the mains power cables to the devices it seems just about right.
 
Simon42 said:
I would definitely go with 550mm if you can fit it.

I bought a 22U 600mm cabinet thinking that was way deeper than required, but after keeping some service loop spare network cables around the rear and routing the mains power cables to the devices it seems just about right.
Click to expand...
I think the deepest equipment is going to be the Pro Max 24 POE at 325mm so I guess that answers my own question.

Slowly getting lots of new bits to move my equipment from under the stairs cupboard to the garage. Hoping I left the optical internet cable long enough to also move the ONT but not the end of the world if that has to stay where it is.
 
Last edited:
Rainmaker said:
Sorry for the bump, but how are you getting on with this @ChrisD.? I was considering one of these to replace my venerable Ruckus R710 (which pushes 500Mbps over AC 5GHz all day long). My MacBook, iPhone and most other devices in the house are WiFi 6 or above now (some AX, some AXE) so it makes sense to upgrade it alongside the router as we move beyond gigabit WAN. I also considered the Zyzel NWA220AX-6E which is well reviewed and much cheaper, but it only allows 6GHz *or* 5GHz, not both, so no good for more legacy clients.
Click to expand...
Still works well mate but they do have wifi 7 devices now. I’m not really up to speed with all their latest WiFi devices if I’m honest.
 
robj20 said:
I'm after a new 12U cabinet.
Do you think a 450mm deep is enough (315mm usable) or best with a 550mm (410mm usable)?
Click to expand...

I started with a 450mm cab but then decided it would be a good idea to put my server/NAS in there so ended up with a startech open frame adjustable cab that goes from about 590mm to over 1000mm if I want it to. It's very solid. The server is a short 2U case but it really needed the extra depth and I have some room to expand or even place a non-rack mount UPS back there or something. I would plan for some growth rather than just the kit you have now. Save you having to change it all later, assuming you have the space.
 
alex24 said:
I started with a 450mm cab but then decided it would be a good idea to put my server/NAS in there so ended up with a startech open frame adjustable cab that goes from about 590mm to over 1000mm if I want it to. It's very solid. The server is a short 2U case but it really needed the extra depth and I have some room to expand or even place a non-rack mount UPS back there or something. I would plan for some growth rather than just the kit you have now. Save you having to change it all later, assuming you have the space.
Click to expand...
450 would fit everything I have so far Dream Machine SE being the deepest.
So 550 would allow plenty of future stuff, including the Pro Max switch I want. Plus room like you have for my NAS at the bottom, if my measurements are correct it should take up about 4U of height.
 
ChrisD. said:
Still works well mate but they do have wifi 7 devices now. I’m not really up to speed with all their latest WiFi devices if I’m honest.
Click to expand...

Their 7 series devices seem to be having issues for some people with their IoT devices but others have said its easy enough to work around. I have just got 2 7 Pro APs, one wall and one ceiling and so far the wall one has been great and I assume the ceiling one will be great once I have that installed. They run bloody hot though! 54 degrees on the wall AP.
 
I'd be avoiding first-gen Unifi Wi-Fi 7 devices unless you're putting them at work and you've been told that you won't be able to buy new APs for five years. They're physically massive and draw ridiculous amounts of power.
 
Caged said:
I'd be avoiding first-gen Unifi Wi-Fi 7 devices unless you're putting them at work and you've been told that you won't be able to buy new APs for five years. They're physically massive and draw ridiculous amounts of power.
Click to expand...

They do run a little toasty and they are chonky boys.
 
Caged said:
I'd be avoiding first-gen Unifi Wi-Fi 7 devices unless you're putting them at work and you've been told that you won't be able to buy new APs for five years. They're physically massive and draw ridiculous amounts of power.
Click to expand...

My u7 pro doesnt run any more warmer than my u6 pro and draws 1.9w more (these are personal ones in a home environment).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom