-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 1,033
Titan
+200 core 1202
+300 mem 1652
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 2,375
780 result.
very nice score. whats your core/mem overclocked to?
All done, guys can we remember to add GPU clocks to the post please 
All done, guys can we remember to add GPU clocks to the post please
Opps, 1179 core 1765 mem for my run.
Thanks.
Man of Honour
Titan
+200 core 1202
+300 mem 1652
Humbug, have you spotted your typo
It's all in a name.
Man of Honour
Single Titan @1011/1666
Last edited:
Associate
3930K @ 4900
Titan SLI @ 1137/1702
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 2,375
error in leaderboard
3. #3242 - 780 @ 1202 / 1652 - Dirkscooby
Should be titan not 780
13, #3019 - 780 @ ?????? - Boldie007
clockspeeds are 1179 core 1765 mem
3. #3242 - 780 @ 1202 / 1652 - Dirkscooby
Should be titan not 780
13, #3019 - 780 @ ?????? - Boldie007
clockspeeds are 1179 core 1765 mem
All done and fixed, thanks guys.
Kap, do I have your clocks right?
Kap, do I have your clocks right?
Man of Honour
Done, ^^^ thanks
Soldato
Tried it on my old system which i donated to my parents. Not bad for what it is, but shows how far things have moved on. I didn't try overclocking the card, might give it a go to see how much it would yield. System is an Athlon64 3700 @ 2.8GHz & an HD6850 775/1000.
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2012
- Posts
- 1,737
Here is my 780 result. Not finished squeezing all I can from it yet. CPU @ 4.8 GHz:
Hmm, 2556 with a single GTX 780 @ stock boost of 1006 and a i7 [email protected] Way off where I should be by the looks of it. Looks like I might have to go down the route of a full reinstall of windows.
Edit: On further reflection maybe my card is running fine and it's just Moogleys which is an absolute beast. I've beaten the top 7970 score on the table and that had a GPU clock 32% over a stock Ghz edition card, this would put performance broadly in line with all the reviews. Need a few more results to compare to, come on all you 780 owners
Edit: On further reflection maybe my card is running fine and it's just Moogleys which is an absolute beast. I've beaten the top 7970 score on the table and that had a GPU clock 32% over a stock Ghz edition card, this would put performance broadly in line with all the reviews. Need a few more results to compare to, come on all you 780 owners
Last edited:
i7 [email protected], GTX 780@1006 stock boost, 320.18WHQL, Win7 64bit
i7 [email protected], 2x GTX 780@1006 stock boost, 320.18WHQL, Win7 64bit
SLI results are poor as I think my second card is dropping back to PCI-E 1.1 speeds. Using the full screen render test in GPU-Z (v0.7.1) the second card starts off at PCI-E 2 but then drops back to 1.1 after 5-6 seconds.
i7 [email protected], 2x GTX 780@1006 stock boost, 320.18WHQL, Win7 64bit
SLI results are poor as I think my second card is dropping back to PCI-E 1.1 speeds. Using the full screen render test in GPU-Z (v0.7.1) the second card starts off at PCI-E 2 but then drops back to 1.1 after 5-6 seconds.
Man of Honour
In this bench even more so than Heaven 4, when using more than one card high CPU clock speeds are very important. With two or more cards it is very easy to CPU bottleneck them.
When I run my cards on this bench @1080p the bottlenecking is terrible, it is only when I turn the resolution up to 1600p that my cards will run flat out.