OFP 2 or Arma 2?

Associate
Joined
19 Apr 2008
Posts
1,223
Location
windy Anglesey
I have Arma 1 that runs nicely on my Acer laptop (4GB RAM & Ati 4650 1GB gpu) in high mode. Knowing that Arma 2 is multiple core friendly, is it worth me buying Arma2 and hope it runs at decent frames or should I take the risk and get OFP2 instead (known to run better on similar systems)? I like playing single player & creating massive open field battles where I am just an ordinary grunt admiring the skirmishes around me :)
 
ofp2 is good despite people bashing it although you can only get 63 ai entitys in the level editor atm and it runs great on mid end systems
 
Depends on whether you want a mil sim or an open world fps, they are both good in there own respects. If you can afford it get both!
 
Arma2 for the win !

If your more of a run and gun kinda FPS guy then OFP2

Edit:
If you have arma1 , have you ever tried the ACE mod ?
It makes the game so much better than vanilla arma
 
Both are horrendous imo...

ArmA2 is needlessly over complicated for "realism" sake - turning it into a chore to play...

While I admit I've not played much OFP2 it seems to suffer from consolitis and not knowing if its COD4 or BF2 at times.
 
Both are horrendous imo...

ArmA2 is needlessly over complicated for "realism" sake - turning it into a chore to play...

While I admit I've not played much OFP2 it seems to suffer from consolitis and not knowing if its COD4 or BF2 at times.

How is Arma2 over complicated? I didnt even bother looking at the manual or running thro the practice levels and jumped straight in. It might be a little more complicated than your average FPS but then its not a FPS.
 
Both are horrendous imo...

ArmA2 is needlessly over complicated for "realism" sake - turning it into a chore to play...

While I admit I've not played much OFP2 it seems to suffer from consolitis and not knowing if its COD4 or BF2 at times.


Thats why real military training is done of the arma engine (VBS is based on arma and is used by a lot of military trainers)
Its NOT an FPS , its a military simulator were you have to use more buttons than the
simple FPS type , eg run , jump , fire etc , so it not full of bunny hopping idiots
 
The reason why ArmA 2 can seem "clunky" is because it simulates full body dynamic...every game that would try that would feel the same.It goes with being military simulator as opposed to run and gun shooter aka OFP2.
 
I am very much an Arma fan, but do find OFP enjoyable as a single player game (MP is totally unplayable for me as I rarely get connection and keep losing sound/requiring reboot) for some short bursts of play, which is also what I 'use' COD4 for. But for more of a thinking, planning game it is Arma all the way, even for setting up trivial missions like flying around trying to go under the spans of bridges, assaulting the aircraft carrier etc..

However, with the CAA1 mod allowing the Arma1 maps to be added to and played in Arma2 this adds another dimension, plus there has been some progress on the BIS forums around the idea of using RAMdisks to speed up the loading of various elements in the game. I have set one up and the 'clunkiness' sometimes referred to I think might be down to the flickering textures and popping up of objects - both are massively reduced in a RAMdisk setup and the game feels much smoother - so worth a try if you have chunk of RAM not being used. Of course, if your hardware is under the required spec it might not help that much . . .

cjph
 
Back
Top Bottom