Only fools and horses question
- Thread starter katy81
- Start date
More importantly, he didn't have a trading licence, or permission to sell as a street vender.
The police would have to prove those toys were nicked, they had him bang to rights on the selling.
And possibly most importantly, for comedy effect and to give a reason for the chase scene.
The police would have to prove those toys were nicked, they had him bang to rights on the selling.
And possibly most importantly, for comedy effect and to give a reason for the chase scene.
Yeah that was my thinking
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,379
Mange tout, Rodney... Mange tout
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2016
- Posts
- 13,161
The american version is better
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 8,797
- Location
- *̡̡ı ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡̡
It's weird but I struggle to find the programme funny at all. Perhaps I am old and grumpy and been through too much crap lately. It reminds me of any episode of Eastenders.
I laughed at the Christopher Lloyd's probably dead line.The american version is better
The writing and performance there is utterly perfect, I've been around enough markets and the style and intonation of his patter as he's trying to sell is absolutely spot on.
yeah m8, u?
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 47,132
Back when the police actually cared about such things. These days the traders have setup actual physical shops.
I've never actually watched an episode tbh.
Is it not... "Durin' the war"
Welcome to my ignore list
Maybe. The particular moment I remember was definitely “when I was in the war”