OpenWrt ships its own router

2x 2.5Gb and a single 1Gb would be useful, this looks like a prototype. I assume the Wi-Fi comes for free with the SoC but even that is a daft decision, and the PoE is to power it when it would be far more useful to have it (optionally with an add-in board) able to provide PoE to attached devices.

It is cheap though, I'm probably being a bit too harsh.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully it'll improve with other revisions, I've always found it annoying trying to spec a router for openwrt.

I've gone down the route of separate hardware for my WiFi AP so that it can be upgraded in isolation. I think I'll end up virtualising the router on my proxmox server anyway (since I put a 4 port NIC on that, which is 1gbps but again can easily be upgraded in isolation).
 
Last edited:
As the OP said cpu, would have been perfect for a Plex Server with MVMe onboard and faster quad core cpu, or anything usefull ie container or even VPN. Yeah lets hope they get a grip of it. Maybe people are too snobbish and want everything built in these days. I guess PoE makes sense with the dual core only cpu to keep the power feed low.
 
Last edited:
As the OP said cpu, would have been perfect for a Plex Server with MVMe onboard and faster quad core cpu, or anything usefull ie container or even VPN. Yeah lets hope they get a grip of it. Maybe people are too snobbish and want everything built in these days. I guess PoE makes sense with the dual core only cpu to keep the power feed low.
Maybe take a look at the Gl.Inet MT6000 quad core running a (lightly skinned) OpenWrt. I think you can wipe it and put vanilla OpenWrt instead if needed.
 
Last edited:
I can only echo the above sentiments. The single 2.5Gb port makes no sense, especially on WAN. At least on LAN you could argue a faster LAN connection benefits more users, and 'multi-gig' WAN connections aren't as common. The WiFi 6 is a shame too, given that AXE is a thing, and 7 will be out and 'standard' soon enough. That said, it's basically just a Banana board, and they sell much nicer and more suited boards with decent ports, SFP+ pre-made cases and bundles, etc. That's where I'd be looking if I wanted this type of thing (rather than just straight x86).
 
Mixed feelings on this, it’s reasonably priced and comes from what feels like a good place, but the hardware choices are frankly disappointing in a multi-gig world. Then again, if you view it as a gigabit capable router option, it’s not awful, and perhaps this partnership may spawn something more useful in the future.
 
I hope this doesn't give people a really bad impression of OpenWRT due to the port stuff. It is really bizarre and when this was announced months ago people had the same statements.

Really one of the best free software imo but the price is also pretty high for this. If you know what you're doing you can get Wifi 6 AX6000, a much better CPU (2 Ghz MT7986A), 2 x 2.5 Gbps ports and 4 Gigabit ports that will run openWRT for under £50.
 
Last edited:
I hope this doesn't give people a really bad impression of OpenWRT due to the port stuff. It is really bizarre and when this was announced months ago people had the same statements.

Really one of the best free software imo but the price is also pretty high for this. If you know what you're doing you can get Wifi 6 AX6000, a much better CPU (2 Ghz MT7986A), 2 x 2.5 Gbps ports and 4 Gigabit ports that will run openWRT for under £50.
Which hardware is this ?
 
Which hardware is this ?
Zyxel EX5601

The main reason for this is that Hyperoptic supply it as their higher tier router. There is 2 versions: a T0 and T1 but the only difference is one has a SFP cage and the other does not. Both are fully supported though. It's also very big in Netherlands selling for 30 euros for the same reason (a big NL ISP supplies them).

On that normal place you can get them pre flashed with OpenWRT (flashing yourself seems pretty hard). One seems to pop up every week or so.
 
Back
Top Bottom