Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
trojan698 said:You'd be better off going for a Athlon 3700+ san diego as they clock just as well, have a higher multi and are very cheap atm.
I believe biostar make good matx boards that clock well although ocuk dont stock them.
Its_Me said:Yes.
Or go for the 3800 X2 - presents a great price point/performance level and is dual core so will give that little extra future lifespan.
Thorpy said:am2..939 ?
ajgoodfellow said:If you're building a new PC then I'd get an AM2 CPU as Socket 939 is no longer in production and it's being phased out
ajgoodfellow said:If you're building a new PC then I'd get an AM2 CPU as Socket 939 is no longer in production and it's being phased out
ajgoodfellow said:If you're building a new PC then I'd get an AM2 CPU as Socket 939 is no longer in production and it's being phased out
easyrider said:If you're building a new PC then I'd get a conroe system.Simply because you can have the performance that beats an AMD FX 62 cpu for 135 quid.
Why buy old 95nm tech?
Why buy slower cpu's?
If you are buying a new system conroe is the way to go.
AMD is slow by comparison
Cyber-Mav said:who is using 95nm technology?