My girlfriend recently got an 'upgrade' on her Orange contract, done through a third party (she's already got plenty of stick from me, so save it for another thread). The upgrade phone developed a charging fault after ~3 weeks so she sent it back. By the time it was received and all sorted by the third party, Orange have said the 28 day return period has passed and refuse to allow another upgrade to be issued to replace the faulty phone. The third party don't want to know, unless it comes from the gospel of Orange. The two companies seem reluctant to speak to each other.
We spoke to the local Orange shop today and they seemed all too happy to give her a new phone (they mentioned that she was in upgrade band 5!1!!1, whatever that means) once the mess had been resolved.
Before I go writing a nice letter to Orange and the third party, is this common practice? I can't see that sending a faulty phone back, even outside of a period dictated by the Sale of Goods Act, can effectively be ignored, can it?
In case any of you are still in any doubt about third parties offering 'upgrades', let this be a lesson to you.
We spoke to the local Orange shop today and they seemed all too happy to give her a new phone (they mentioned that she was in upgrade band 5!1!!1, whatever that means) once the mess had been resolved.
Before I go writing a nice letter to Orange and the third party, is this common practice? I can't see that sending a faulty phone back, even outside of a period dictated by the Sale of Goods Act, can effectively be ignored, can it?
In case any of you are still in any doubt about third parties offering 'upgrades', let this be a lesson to you.