Organising, storing, backups and lightroom

mctiny

mctiny

mctiny

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,073
Location
cidade maravilhosa
I jump straight to the point, or rather points....


I'm trying to organise/sort out around 300gb of photos, and was wondering what everyone else does to combat the ever growing amount of photos...


Currently I'm importing photos to one physical location and creating multiple catalogs depending on themes, work/personal - for example.

For the past two years I've been using a 60D and saving the jpg and CR2 files in the same locations, with a single folder backup/dump on an external drive.

Lightroom catalogs are stored separately as well.. and as you can see it's a mess

So I'm looking at cleaning up my act and going for a new scheme of saving, cataloging and backing up, my photos.

I just don't know the best way to approach this...

So, What do you guys do ?
 
300GB doesn't sound a lot if they are RAWs? I handle 30k personal photos in a single catalogue, I wouldn't bother splitting them if I was you. Use metadata to tag your photos for searching purposes instead.

Some people keep jpgs, some discard the raws after a while. I just keep the RAWs and export to jpg when needed.

I keep my photos organised by year and month, then each month in folders named according to the shoot. One bit that lightroom could help with is searching by folder name... so need to keep that metatdata up to date.

That's pretty much what I do, import, organise by year / month / shoot name, keep RAWs, don't bother with JPEGs, backup the imports, backup the catalogue (redundanct copies on-site, offisite USB media and cloud) and away I go.

Organising things by year month help with backups, as I upload the monthly folder to Amazon every, well, month or so..

works for me.
 
Genoma said:
300GB doesn't sound a lot if they are RAWs? I handle 30k personal photos in a single catalogue, I wouldn't bother splitting them if I was you. Use metadata to tag your photos for searching purposes instead.

Some people keep jpgs, some discard the raws after a while. I just keep the RAWs and export to jpg when needed.

I keep my photos organised by year and month, then each month in folders named according to the shoot. One bit that lightroom could help with is searching by folder name... so need to keep that metatdata up to date.

That's pretty much what I do, import, organise by year / month / shoot name, keep RAWs, don't bother with JPEGs, backup the imports, backup the catalogue (redundanct copies on-site, offisite USB media and cloud) and away I go.

Organising things by year month help with backups, as I upload the monthly folder to Amazon every, well, month or so..

works for me.
Click to expand...

Not all RAW, I have around 7 years of JPG's and 2+ of JPG+RAW's.

I was importing to "year/month/day" structure, which was working fine until I started shooting in RAW, as I wanted to keep RAW's seperate.

I'll keep the RAW files forever as some are work related - photo's I've sold, so I can keep them if I ever need to prove ownership at a later date.
 
Working Drive - running in RAID 0 (mirror) 2TB.
Archive Drive - Running in RAID 5 - about 12TB.

Working drive is split into year/months/date.

Like this. Regular stuff is just a date, projects have names next to it for important identification.

HdNibi0.png

When its done. It's convert to DNG then copied to the Drobo drive and cloud.

All RAWs, don't shoot Jpeg.
 
Raymond Lin said:
Working Drive - running in RAID 0 (mirror) 2TB.
Archive Drive - Running in RAID 5 - about 12TB.

Working drive is split into year/months/date.

Like this. Regular stuff is just a date, projects have names next to it for important identification.

HdNibi0.png

When its done. It's convert to DNG then copied to the Drobo drive and cloud.

All RAWs, don't shoot Jpeg.
Click to expand...
Any advantage with DNG's over CR2-RAW?

Also which cloud service are you using?
 
mctiny said:
Any advantage with DNG's over CR2-RAW?

Also which cloud service are you using?
Click to expand...

By the time I convert to DNG I am very unlikely will process the photo again. As far as I am concerned, that is done. So with DNG all the settings applied to the photo is embedded into the photo yet retain the "RAWness" of its character. It is also smaller file size than CR2.

I upload it to Amazon cloud.
 
My Folders are dated example 12-12-2015 Macro
In that folder are my Raw files. I then import into Lightroom and domy processing. Each processed image is opened in Photoshop5 and finished off then saved as a Tiff. I then put those Tiff files into another folder named TIFFS in the same folder. I then open Bridge and make those tiffs into JPGs. so I now have a folder of RAWs, a folder of Tiffs, a folder of Jpgs. When finished I open Lightroom and do a Sync folders.
I then backup to another hard drive (3TB). I am a member of two camera clubs and enter comps. I also enter Internationals/Nationals and I print up to A3 and mount them.
Reason for the RAW, Tiffs, Jpgs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom