13 Apr 2010 at 19:18 #1 p0ss3s3d p0ss3s3d Associate Joined 30 Dec 2008 Posts 1,940 Nicked from TP, might've been posted before on here not sure anyway - how unlucky/foolish must this guy be!!
Nicked from TP, might've been posted before on here not sure anyway - how unlucky/foolish must this guy be!!
13 Apr 2010 at 19:25 #4 p0ss3s3d p0ss3s3d Associate OP Joined 30 Dec 2008 Posts 1,940 I guess he's picked the camera up. If you forget to lift it by the lens the camera is designed to rip like that so you don't damage the lens.
I guess he's picked the camera up. If you forget to lift it by the lens the camera is designed to rip like that so you don't damage the lens.
13 Apr 2010 at 20:11 #10 p0ss3s3d p0ss3s3d Associate OP Joined 30 Dec 2008 Posts 1,940 Mr-White said: On the bright side it could have been paparazzi, in which case we can only hope it was wrapped round his head MW Click to expand...
Mr-White said: On the bright side it could have been paparazzi, in which case we can only hope it was wrapped round his head MW Click to expand...
13 Apr 2010 at 20:59 #15 p0ss3s3d p0ss3s3d Associate OP Joined 30 Dec 2008 Posts 1,940 Hotwired said: Is the lens really that much more expensive than the body to warrant sacrificing the body first? o.0 Click to expand... Yes. Generally 600mm f/4 = £7500 1D series = £2500
Hotwired said: Is the lens really that much more expensive than the body to warrant sacrificing the body first? o.0 Click to expand... Yes. Generally 600mm f/4 = £7500 1D series = £2500
13 Apr 2010 at 23:44 #17 p0ss3s3d p0ss3s3d Associate OP Joined 30 Dec 2008 Posts 1,940 Yeah, looking at it again it does look like force has been applied to the camera from a tumble. Lucky not to break the lens really.
Yeah, looking at it again it does look like force has been applied to the camera from a tumble. Lucky not to break the lens really.