• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OZONE 3D SOFT SHADOWS BENCH

chaparral said:
You mean like this ;)

untitled3.jpg
Click to expand...

lol, you owe me two new index fingers...lol

------------------------------------------
 
I dont udnerstand this, but how come is the results so unusual with some X1950's beating GTS's and some GTS's beating GTX's when the GTX's could be on better systems :confused:
 
willhub said:
I dont udnerstand this, but how come is the results so unusual with some X1950's beating GTS's and some GTS's beating GTX's when the GTX's could be on better systems :confused:
Click to expand...

It depends entirely on your PC's configuration....aswell as driver used...background apps..etc..etc
chaparral said:
LOL

Thanks for the work & time your putting with this thread and your 3dmark06 one.... :cool:
Click to expand...
Not a problem mate....we MUST have TOP-LISTS they make the world go round ;) Nice to know it's appreciated too :)
--------------------------------------
updated
 
I don't know how either, it mainly seems to be down to driver version but there are some strange problems such as pushing my gtx over 680/2000 on either the ram or core changes nothing, does the same on my laptop, anything over 590/750 doesn't change anything. :confused:

Still it's a great bit of fun.
 
Ok just manged to get 3284 @ 702/1008 (2016) on my X1950XT. Of course that was running my fan at 100%. That running XP Pro SP2 with 7.6 drivers and ATiTool. No catalyst installed, and no 'tweaks' performed to drivers. It is running totally standard as installed. Hmm... gonna see if I can remember my photobucket password.

A strange thing though. At 695/1008 I got a 1 point decrease compared to 675/999. Strange. I tested 3 times @ 695 and got an identical score for each test run.. pretty consistant lol.

Hmm... considering whether to push my luck and put more than 1.45v through my xt and up the core and try upping the memory voltage as well? Any advice on max values here?

Matthew
 
Scougar said:
Ok just manged to get 3284 @ 702/1008 (2016) on my X1950XT.

Hmm... considering whether to push my luck and put more than 1.45v through my xt and up the core and try upping the memory voltage as well? Any advice on max values here?

Matthew
Click to expand...

I couldn't tell you mate......not up on ATi at all :(

Surely someone else here will have some advice.
Mitch007 said:
730 with sig rig :(
Click to expand...
---------------------------
updated
 
X1950XT @ 702/ 1044 (2070) = 3346Matthew

And clocked to E4300 @2.6Ghz.. but it actually LOWERED my score by 3 points by having an extra 200mhz on the CPU (instead of 2.4ghz) :confused:

I am pretty sure pushing my upper limit now. I reckon, 3400 absolute max with stock cooling, we will see.

Matthew
 
Cool :) I tried adjusting the res, to see if that was making a difference to the scores, and can say that it auto adjusts back to 1280*1024 for the benchmark. Some peoples resolution isn't that (i.e. widescreen).. so just wondering if this is something that might be affecting the scores.

I also corrupted my drivers it seems as it was crashing every time I tried to alter a setting (video frequency and resolution if I lowered it... but not if I made it higher lol).

Anyway... 3346 was the best I could get without getting too risky. Any higher on mem or core and it bails out :(

EDIT: I'm also considering slipping in my 5700LE 128MB AGP and seeing if I can attain a better score than Mike Hunt at 13 lol. Getting late now, so will prob attempt tomorrow for a laugh :)

EDIT 2: Confused about some of the scores on this, as there is a huge variety, and it's not like I have exactly the best spec. My card is limited by a x4 pci-e slot so should have reduced my performance significantly. Cyber-Mavs score is one for concern, as that seems exceptionally low for an x1900xt.

For info I install only the 7.6 ati driver + wdm driver (no catalyst), and then install ATI Tool, and just adjust clock with it. No tweaks or tricks are performed, other than an overclock.

Matthew
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom