Soldato
killer_uk said:Bah, 3 points under Scougar. I will beat him.
lol, bring it on Think i'll just push my clocks a bit further and run my fan at 100% Be right back
Matthew
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
killer_uk said:Bah, 3 points under Scougar. I will beat him.
chaparral said:You mean like this
LOLSOLDNER-MOFO64 said:lol, you owe me two new index fingers...lol
------------------------------------------
willhub said:I dont udnerstand this, but how come is the results so unusual with some X1950's beating GTS's and some GTS's beating GTX's when the GTX's could be on better systems
Not a problem mate....we MUST have TOP-LISTS they make the world go round Nice to know it's appreciated toochaparral said:LOL
Thanks for the work & time your putting with this thread and your 3dmark06 one....
lay-z-boy said:Still it's a great bit of fun.
updatedbroona said:Running Vista Business, 7900GT
Scougar said:Ok just manged to get 3284 @ 702/1008 (2016) on my X1950XT.
Hmm... considering whether to push my luck and put more than 1.45v through my xt and up the core and try upping the memory voltage as well? Any advice on max values here?
Matthew
---------------------------Mitch007 said:730 with sig rig
Damien. said:Managed to get a little more out of her !
Damien. said:Managed to get a little more out of her !
Scougar said:X1950XT @ 702/ 1035 (2070) = 3308
Come on killer.. give it your best shot
Matthew
Scougar said:X1950XT @ 702/ 1044 (2070) = 3346Matthew