Panorama stiching

Soldato
Joined
15 Feb 2003
Posts
10,141
Location
Europe
Got a few of these to stitch together using Hugin.

They were mostly taken between 28-35mm.

Just wondering that peoples' options are on the best projection method when it comes to Panoramas.

So far I've tried Panini, Rectangular, Equirectangualr, and Architectural. Not sure what's best really.
 
Try downloading Microsoft ICE and use the rotation method of stitching. Seems to work best for me. Is one of the ones you've mentioned similar?
 
How do you tell that? Does Hugin show it?

In terms of physically moving the camera I guess it's around 25-50% most of the time.

Got a few panoramas ranging form 6 - 14 photos
 
There's not really an ideal way to tell. I'm not sure what your issue is with the different types of stitching? Normally when i do one with a rotation stitch there's normally one possibly two places where you can see the physical join of the photos.
 
Ah I think there's a misunderstanding.

I don't have any issues per se. It's not like i'm seeing joins int he photos.

My question is specifically around projection. It's basically the distortion of the image. So you have options such as fish-eye, and panini and others that all alter the projection or distort the image in some way.

I was just wondering which projections are the most widely used.'

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-projections.htm
 
Last edited:
Just use whatever suits your purpose, there is no 'right' way. Sometimes it's best to reduce distortion, and sometimes it's best to capture a wide angle of view.

I used to enjoy printing out 180degrees + panormas and physically 'wrapping' the page back into a loop. The distortion just disappears, albeit you are now holding a curved bit of paper.
 
Back
Top Bottom