Bit of a pickle, a relative is currently paying out of contract pricing on phone and broadband with BT because a line regrade is yet to be completed after 2 months and wont be till at least november.
They say it's fair to charge £43 for Fibre 1 because she's technically out of contract and she's receiving a service (not fibre 1 just standard broadband because they still haven't installed it). So she's essentially paying twice as much for a service she's not fully receiving. Bills are topping £90 a month!
Am I right to think it's unacceptable to charge out of contract pricing for a service she's ordered but hasn't even received yet?
They say it's fair to charge £43 for Fibre 1 because she's technically out of contract and she's receiving a service (not fibre 1 just standard broadband because they still haven't installed it). So she's essentially paying twice as much for a service she's not fully receiving. Bills are topping £90 a month!
Am I right to think it's unacceptable to charge out of contract pricing for a service she's ordered but hasn't even received yet?