[Pchardware.de] Mass Effect: Andromeda bencmarks

[Doom112]

GTX 1070 and GTX 980 Ti are 40-45% faster than Fury X in this game and both are tested on latest game ready driver.

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mass-...55712/Specials/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-1223325/

 

[Wrinkly]

980Ti still giving great performance.

 

[BigBANGtheory]

1080Ti is going to struggle to hit 4K@60fps by the looks of it here

 

[Razor Time]

980Ti still giving great performance.

Performance is in the toilet @ 3440 x 1440.

 

[Doom112]

1080Ti is going to struggle to hit 4K@60fps by the looks of it here

It depends. High with Ultra setting can easily maintain 60fps on 4k.

 

[JediFragger]

Fury FTW!!!

 

[TheRealDeal]

GTX 1070 and GTX 980 Ti are 40-45% faster than Fury X in this game and both are tested on latest game ready driver.

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mass-...55712/Specials/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-1223325/

Sure is but in the mid range the RX480 leads the pack. Seems like AMD are having a difficult time extracting the full performance from the older GCN cards.

 

[Raiden85]

Fury FTW!!!

2x 1080Ti's FTW

Never looked into this game, looks good though and it is great how well the 980 Ti is still doing

 

[Doom112]

Sure is but in the mid range the RX480 leads the pack. Seems like AMD are having a difficult time extracting the full performance from the older GCN cards.

I think you are comparing GTX 1060 3GB with RX 480 8GB. GTX 1060 6GB benchmarks are not out yet.

 

[TheRealDeal]

I think you are comparing GTX 1060 3GB with RX 480 8GB. GTX 1060 6GB benchmarks are not out yet.

Either way the performance is there on Polaris but not on Fiji and to an extent Hawaii. I take it this game has no Dx12 which would probably sort out the older GCN cards.

 

[Wrinkly]

Performance is in the toilet @ 3440 x 1440.

Not really a concern yet as so few use it.

 

[DragonQ]

AMD's latest drivers claim 12% FPS boost at 1080p. I think they came out today so not sure if the reviewer used them?

 

[Gregster]

This is a must buy for me but just need to find the time to play Great to see good performance for such a sweet looking game.

 

[fs123]

I think you are comparing GTX 1060 3GB with RX 480 8GB. GTX 1060 6GB benchmarks are not out yet.

The 1060 6GB is about the same as the 480 which means something not quite right with the FuryX result.

 

[Razor Time]

Not really a concern yet as so few use it.

It is for me

2560 x 1440 is in the low 40s so not great either.

 

[Freddie1980]

If I spent £500 on a AMD Fury X I would surely be frurios with that level of performance. I would write an email to Lisa Su herself to complain about it and I wouldn't hold back with the langanuge either, you could even say it would X rated.

 

[Gregster]

The 1060 6GB is about the same as the 480 which means something not quite right with the FuryX result.

I think AMD need to optimise really, as in the vid, the guy said the 1060 felt much smoother over the 480, even though frames were very close.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

If I spent £500 on a AMD Fury X I would surely be frurios with that level of performance. I would write an email to Lisa Su herself to complain about it and I wouldn't hold back with the langanuge either, you could even say it would X rated.

Furys are old gen, they are coming upto 2yrs old.

 

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

The performance difference between a GTX1080 and RX470 seems in-line with what I saw with a GTX1080FE and a Powercolor Devil RX470 4GB in Dragon Age:Inquisition which uses the same engine and this is with the latest drivers as of a few days ago.

I was getting around 66 FPS with the GTX1080 and 34 FPS with the RX470.

So around half the performance of the GTX1080 seems about right for an RX470 especially if the new AMD driver ups performance another 12% or thereabouts.

 

[Poneros]

Wish I was excited for this game, but after watching a few gameplay videos of it I'm afraid it looks too much like DA:I and too little like the previous games. Still, performance-wise and in terms of visuals, it looks ace.