• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

PCI-E V1.1 vs. PCI-E V2

Associate
Joined
7 Sep 2003
Posts
1,897
Location
Bo'ness
I know that this is going to be a tricky question to answer as nobody has used or even seen a PCI-E 2.0 graphics card but I am going to ask it just to see people’s thoughts.

Do you think PCI-E 2.0 is going to be needed for the next generation cards or will PCI-E 1.1 be sufficient? How close are currents card to saturating the PCI-E 1.1 bus? :)
 
No, I think it's just a terrible way to force people to get new mainboards :(.
I think AGP would still be fast enough.

pcie2= A bunch of marketing ******** imo.
 
Current high end cards are perfectly happy on x8 PCI-E so the next gen of cards will be happy on x16 anyway and maybe even the next generation after that again won't have a significant performance penalty being on PCI-E 1.1.

Jokester
 
So why on earth, will they make the next gen of cards pci-e 2.0, when they don't need it then?
Is it the reason I mentioned, to force people to buy new mainboards? Thats just cruel :(.
The trend seems to be to take away the future-proofness of everything these days.

Where are the days where u can buy a board for 1 socket, and have everything work on it of that socket ( ie. a socket 775 board, with support from 533mhz fsb p4's & celerons to 1333mhz fsb c2d's and quads and peryns, together with ddr1-3 support and all gfx card support from geforce 4 to gefore 9 or something?)

I understand sometimes future proofing isn't possible, but why on earth drop support for older stuff, ie. AGP, IDE, Pcie1.0, 533 mhz p4's ?
Dont they understand soem stuff doesn't need improvement yet ( gfx interface, ide/sata interface to name 2).
 
Last edited:
Its business things have to move along so tech doesnt get stale. Also no one says u have to buy a 2.0 pci e board for the latest cards so just upgrade to them when u feel its right for you.
 
From what I've read the new AMD boards with PCI-E 2.0 will have BIOS selectable power adjustments so for example you'll be able to configure PCI-E x16 slot 1 to provide 200w if you wanted to and you can turn off the power to the slots not being used.
 
PCI-E 2.0 is backwards compatible with PCI-E 1.1 so there is no need to buy a new motherboard in the short term.

Jokester
 
Medium term it may mean slightly more expensive cards I guess, as they will need to put another power path (connectors) on in order to power the card in case it's a PCI-1 board compatible. (That's my guess anyway).

Matthew
 
THG did a review of the 8800gts (iirc) vs the x1900xt on various bus speeds, the 8 series take quite a hit with lower bus speeds.
pci-e 2 might give a slight boost, it will be like 7800 sli in 2*8x vs 2*16x boards over again.
 
Cant see 1.1 x16 being properly saturated by many anytime soon, 2.0 will become extremely handy as soon as the whole GPU physics thing takes off i think though.
Nothing wrong with technological advancements really is there?
 
PCI-E 2.0 is backwards compatible with PCI-E 1.1 so there is no need to buy a new motherboard in the short term.

Jokester

Yes there is, anyone with an am2 board, a 939 board, a 754 board, a 478 board, a lga 775 with a 975x board, with a 945p board, and anything older is screwed, as it's all pcie 1.0.
 
Back
Top Bottom