If you stack tecs it will end terribly badly, for the reasons above. If one removes 100W and throws out 200W in total, the next in the stack would have to be able to comfortably remove 200W and these don't exist. All you'd do is kill your peltiers if you stacked them.
Jokesters approach is the historical one, back when cpus threw out small enough amounts of heat that peltiers could cope with it. Now reasonable (geometrically) sized pelts are far underpowered to cope with a significant overclock on a processor, so several in heat exchanger fashion is the way to go. This has issues as well of course, namely that I seem to need an extra quad radiator and a psu which doesn't flinch at 57A @12V constant draw.
Nb/sb peltier is a ridiculous notion in most senses, what makes you think that's a good idea?
Jokesters approach is the historical one, back when cpus threw out small enough amounts of heat that peltiers could cope with it. Now reasonable (geometrically) sized pelts are far underpowered to cope with a significant overclock on a processor, so several in heat exchanger fashion is the way to go. This has issues as well of course, namely that I seem to need an extra quad radiator and a psu which doesn't flinch at 57A @12V constant draw.
Nb/sb peltier is a ridiculous notion in most senses, what makes you think that's a good idea?